Beta
Smile!
"let the first one amongst you who has not eaten bacon or shrimp or worked on the Sabbath be the first one to deny the gay person their cake" yeah, don't see that happening.![]()
Ed Zachary!

"let the first one amongst you who has not eaten bacon or shrimp or worked on the Sabbath be the first one to deny the gay person their cake" yeah, don't see that happening.![]()
You're not really paying attention to what I'm posting. Because you served someone does not mean you condone their behavior. Did Jesus condone adultery? Yet he still forgave her and told her to sin no more. He did not turn her away, he did not demand she be stoned (as their law demanded); he loved her and had mercy on her. But he did not condone her behavior.
John 2:13 - 15
When it was almost time for the Jewish Passover, Jesus went up to Jerusalem. In the temple courts he found people selling cattle, sheep and doves, and others sitting at tables exchanging money. So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.
"let the first one amongst you who has not eaten bacon or shrimp or worked on the Sabbath be the first one to deny the gay person their cake"
But when he encountered other sinners - he whipped them.....
But when he encountered other sinners - he whipped them.....
Devoid of a better answer for this... Perhaps Jesus saw a huge difference between someone who commits a sin, and someone who defiles the temple for financial gain.
I have to disagree with your logic that gay rights and civil rights are fundamentally different, even though I agree that the government shouldn't have a say in who a business does business with. You either agree with free market capitalism or communism, half measures just leaves the door open for lawyers to muck up everything.Good Morning, Beta!
Holy Moly those are pretty big Red Herrings you've thrown into the discussion here.
But since you've brought them up, I will try and answer them.
Neither religion nor gay rights have ANYTHING to do with civil rights and you using it is equivalent to someone playing the Race/Hate card. Hello! This isn't about refusing someone on race.
Once (or twice, I'm losing count here) again, he didn't refuse service to them because of their sexual orientation or WHO THEY WERE, he refused because he was asked to do something that was against his beliefs. It is not against the Christian faith to do business with gays, but it is against the Christian faith to knowingly participate and profit from a gay marriage or civil union. THAT'S the point.
By the way... I'm finding it SO ironic that most people on this board say these bakers (as well as Christians) are SOOOO hateful and intolerent and discriminating when they themselves are SOOOO hateful and intolerant and discriminating against this baker (and Christians). YOU are the ones forcing us to do something we do not believe in. YOU are the ones who are the bullies here, not us.
YOU preach at US and tell us not to judge but then have the freaking nerves to JUDGE AND LABEL US by lumping us in with some disgusting looney-tunes hate group (Westboro Baptists).
But I guess that's okay...![]()
And its all academic really, the law is the law is the law. Whether you disagree with it or not, if you break it, you face the punishment. And right now the law declares that sexual preference is a protected class on the same level as race. And the interpretation of that is far ranging.I have to disagree with your logic that gay rights and civil rights are fundamentally different, even though I agree that the government shouldn't have a say in who a business does business with. You either agree with free market capitalism or communism, half measures just leaves the door open for lawyers to muck up everything.
I’m coming strictly from a biblical standpoint. I hold the same view of Christians that demonize gays as I do gays that are fanatical about demanding everyone accept their lifestyle. But, in today’s America it has become acceptable to openly talk about homosexuality while considered taboo to openly talk about God. It's acceptable to shove the gay lifestyle down everyone's throat, but don't dare do the same with God. In fact, it's has become a requirement to vilify anyone that dare speak out against gays while promoting the vilification of Christianity.
And jazz is GOD'S music!
Ok, there is a simple perception problem here. How many religious shows are on TV? How hard is it to find radio promoting Christ? How many Churches are there? Are people freely and openly congregating at them? How often does a President publicly say "God bless America"? Billboards? Going door to door seeking converts? How about tax benefits?
It is silly to argue Christianity can't be talked about, openly, in public. Further, it is silly to argue that there is ANY comparison to how ingrained into the fabric of daily life the homosexual 'agenda' is when measure against Christianity unless that comparison says 'not much' for homosexuality and 'a whole bunch' for Christianity.
Small pieces at a time Larry. They antis have managed to remove it from our schools, no prayers before games or any other event, Christmas is slowly being reduced to ‘Holiday’. They know they can’t go after the churches and TV shows yet. First there has to be a large enough base of hatred towards Christianity. They aren’t there yet. With everything, progressive are patient and chip away at their agendas slowly.
I’m talking about a growing mentality though… it is becoming increasingly popular to talk positively about homosexuality while increasingly popular to vilify religion – particularly Christianity.
Not directed at you but, general comments; There is the issue; why would anyone find fault with it??? It's like finding fault with someones preference for a football team or a wine or a flavor of ice cream or the beach over the mountains. or any other religion.
This is the sort of thing I come across all the time. YOU can't comprehend it, because you have a different perspective. .
This is the sort of thing I come across all the time. YOU can't comprehend it, because you have a different perspective. You equate sexual preference to preferring the beach over the mountains, or the choice of a football team. .
I would agree that the tide is turning but, I don't agree that Christ is banished from public and only gay can be spoken or anything close to it.
In the mean time, if I were trying to reverse that trend or, at least protect the faith, I would not be happy that people are taking these enormous moral stands against baking cakes for homos nor would I be happy that candidates for office claim God built in an anti pregnancy in case of rape gene nor would I be pursing Constitutional banning of gay marriage and, if I did, I sure as hell wouldn't be shocked were the other side to push back.
If Christianity is losing ground, it is every bit as much because of behavior of many in the faith who are all for religious freedom as long as you choose their faith as it is because of the Big Gay Tide.
Frankly, it is more so the fault of people who claim to be of the faith. Can you imagine where we'd be on this social battle if Christians said, in response to gay marriage, the following;
Good for you!
Whereas you may not like how this goes: Christians largely place all sins in one pot; as we believe God does. We don’t believe God differentiates between homosexual behavior and murder. I know in our world they are hugely different; but in terms of the things that separate us from God, homosexuality causes just as much separation from God as murder. So, as God is looking down on us, we can’t, in our own conscience, say “Good for you”. I mean what makes us happy while making God unhappy, isn’t this the antithesis of being a Christian?
I have to disagree with your logic that gay rights and civil rights are fundamentally different, even though I agree that the government shouldn't have a say in who a business does business with. You either agree with free market capitalism or communism, half measures just leaves the door open for lawyers to muck up everything.
When it comes specifically to sexual preference, if you meant me in particular, I long ago learned that gay people look at the same sex like I look at the opposite sex. Why some religious people can't, or won't comprehend that simple reality is the fascinating part of this.
OK, so, how do you, how does the faith, in your view, reconcile non believers? As murderers? And I don't mean as a practical matter in our modern world but, as a matter of what you are saying, what it is supposed to be?