WOW! Commercial blasts Kerry
- Thread starter ylexot
- Start date
Otter
Nothing to see here
Really??? So its okay to question that, but we can't question Kerry's war record?? Which way do you want it?? A private citizen makes a documentary..Dems "yay"....A private group questions a soldiers story...Dems "boo"..
As for your IIRC, if I wrote over there that Kerry plotted with Imelda Marcus to smuggle shoes into Tibet, would that make it true???
Pete
Repete
This is the infuriating part about arguing with trolls.
Mr. Spoiled, I contend to you that wussy pasifistic appeaser foriegn policy cost us 3,000 + innicent civillian lives in one swift action and thousands more over the course of time, Pan-am, Stark, Cole, Kobar Towers, Beruit Marine barracks, African embasies, WTC 1.
SO what you are saying is that pre-emptive action to prevent barbaric and merciless attacks on our civillian population is wrong when soldiers get killed........But.......sticking out head in the sand and "hoping" the bad terrorists won't do it again is not when civillians get killed.
You are pathetic. It is people like you who are enslaved and live under the boot of terror.
be happy with your new master.Originally posted by Pete
This is the infuriating part about arguing with trolls.
Mr. Spoiled, I contend to you that wussy pasifistic appeaser foriegn policy cost us 3,000 + innicent civillian lives in one swift action and thousands more over the course of time, Pan-am, Stark, Cole, Kobar Towers, Beruit Marine barracks, African embasies, WTC 1.
SO what you are saying is that pre-emptive action to prevent barbaric and merciless attacks on our civillian population is wrong when soldiers get killed........But.......sticking out head in the sand and "hoping" the bad terrorists won't do it again is not when civillians get killed.
You are pathetic. It is people like you who are enslaved and live under the boot of terror.
Spoiled
Active Member
Do you know what IIRC means?
Im just saying, Kerrys duty has been investigated before... He won the awards... If someone had a reason for him not to they should have spoken up, they are his awards.... and i personaly dont give a damn if bush did or didnt show up to work one day...
Spoiled
Active Member
Im not living under the boot of terror... Im not against going into afghanistan... Iraq did not have WMDs when we went in, they did not have the capability of hitting the US... Bush had a hard on for iraq.... and if he didnt the people behind him did and where telling him he should...Originally posted by Pete
This is the infuriating part about arguing with trolls.
Mr. Spoiled, I contend to you that wussy pasifistic appeaser foriegn policy cost us 3,000 + innicent civillian lives in one swift action and thousands more over the course of time, Pan-am, Stark, Cole, Kobar Towers, Beruit Marine barracks, African embasies, WTC 1.
SO what you are saying is that pre-emptive action to prevent barbaric and merciless attacks on our civillian population is wrong when soldiers get killed........But.......sticking out head in the sand and "hoping" the bad terrorists won't do it again is not when civillians get killed.
You are pathetic. It is people like you who are enslaved and live under the boot of terror.
I didnt bring it up, vrai did....
Im saying they have the right to, i just think its moronic (that they sat there not saying anything until now) and obviously very pertizan... They should have spoken up when they where looking into giving him a medal, but i guess they didnt give a damn then because he wasnt running for office....and they wouldnt have gained publicity?
Last edited:
ylexot
Super Genius
Well...yeah.
It's one thing to have random liars and criminals running around in public. It's another thing entirely when we're in danger of having one for our President.What part of that don't you understand?
Otter
Nothing to see here
Originally posted by Spoiled
Im not living under the boot of terror... Im not against going into afghanistan... Iraq did not have WMDs when we went in, they did not have the capability of hitting the US... Bush had a hard on for iraq.... and if he didnt the people behind him did and where telling him he should...
I didnt bring it up, vrai did....
Im saying they have the right to, i just think its moronic and obviously very pertizan... They should have spoken up when they where looking into giving him a medal, but i guess they didnt give a damn then because he wasnt running for office....and they wouldnt have gained publicity?
Oh yeah, do you really think the swifties weren't aware that they would get death threats, hate mail and labeled as nutcases before they went public??? Very cool publicity..dur...Ya ever think that they may have known that him being in the senate wouldn't harm anything so they didn't speak out(btw, I think they were right, 20 yrs - nada)...but as commander-in-chief, they figured they better speak up?? You have your opinion but in mine, someone trotting out 4 months of curious service from 30 yrs ago is weird. Why can't he run on his Senate record?? 
For real. Kerry didn't want them anyway - why would he care if someone disparages them or even takes them away from him?Originally posted by cattitude
which he tossed..no wait..he tossed somebody elses...no wait..they were ribbons..back in those days ribbons and medals were interchangeable....
Pete
Repete
You and your WMD's. Let me ask you a few questions you juvenile pillar of wisdom.
1. Did Iraq ever have WMD's?
2. Did Iraq ever use WMD's?
3. Did Iraq ever manufacture WMD's?
4. Did Iraq allow UN inspectors in to inspect unabaited?
5. Did Iraq fully comply with the UN resolutions imposed on them as part of the cease fire?
6. Did Iraq in fact expell UN weapons inspectors on several occasions?
7. Did Iraq not have a relationship with and sponsor terrorists organizations?
8. Why did Egypt, Jordan and numerous intelligence organizations tell Gen Franks he has Chem weapons and he would use them?
and lastly a rhetorical question for you.
What would you be saying if we had not gone into Iraq and today a improvised chemical weapon provided by Iraq to terrorists went off in a mall in Toledo and gassed 750 innocent women and kids?
Spoiled
Active Member
1. Did Iraq ever have WMD's?
yup
2. Did Iraq ever use WMD's?
yup
3. Did Iraq ever manufacture WMD's?
unless if they where able to import them from somewhere?
4. Did Iraq allow UN inspectors in to inspect unabaited?
When they felt like it
5. Did Iraq fully comply with the UN resolutions imposed on them as part of the cease fire?
nope... Then again arent you one of the people who think the UN is a buncha liberal pussies? and thats why the US doesnt need to listen to them?
6. Did Iraq in fact expell UN weapons inspectors on several occasions?
Yup
7. Did Iraq not have a relationship with and sponsor terrorists organizations?
Not al queda... But im sure there where some,,, mostly going to israel though, who also goes against the UN, infact they go against it more so than any other nation
8. Why did Egypt, Jordan and numerous intelligence organizations tell Gen Franks he has Chem weapons and he would use them?
Why did Chilabi say the same thing? They didnt like Saddam and wanted a piece of the pie? Who knows...
Here is a question for you there are many nations with dictators that came to rule by similar means to saddam's... they also torture people, and have terrorist groups in their nation... should we go to these nations and fight the terrorists there... what if these organizations have had clear direct ties to al queda? Would you be OK with giving the leaders if these nations money in order to keep them 'loyal' to us?
yup
2. Did Iraq ever use WMD's?
yup
3. Did Iraq ever manufacture WMD's?
unless if they where able to import them from somewhere?
4. Did Iraq allow UN inspectors in to inspect unabaited?
When they felt like it
5. Did Iraq fully comply with the UN resolutions imposed on them as part of the cease fire?
nope... Then again arent you one of the people who think the UN is a buncha liberal pussies? and thats why the US doesnt need to listen to them?
6. Did Iraq in fact expell UN weapons inspectors on several occasions?
Yup
7. Did Iraq not have a relationship with and sponsor terrorists organizations?
Not al queda... But im sure there where some,,, mostly going to israel though, who also goes against the UN, infact they go against it more so than any other nation
8. Why did Egypt, Jordan and numerous intelligence organizations tell Gen Franks he has Chem weapons and he would use them?
Why did Chilabi say the same thing? They didnt like Saddam and wanted a piece of the pie? Who knows...
Here is a question for you there are many nations with dictators that came to rule by similar means to saddam's... they also torture people, and have terrorist groups in their nation... should we go to these nations and fight the terrorists there... what if these organizations have had clear direct ties to al queda? Would you be OK with giving the leaders if these nations money in order to keep them 'loyal' to us?