itsbob said:BAD BAD BAD KARMA!!
VRAI, who should I report this to!??
11 yr old hurt boarding... 01-26-2007 12:49 AM I'll give BadGirl a free Premo if she'll smother you in your sleep tonight
Hey, I signed it!
itsbob said:BAD BAD BAD KARMA!!
VRAI, who should I report this to!??
11 yr old hurt boarding... 01-26-2007 12:49 AM I'll give BadGirl a free Premo if she'll smother you in your sleep tonight
Penn said:Andy, with all due respect:
Might this incident not have happened if the girl's mom was there to see her off at the bus stop?
AndyMarquisLIVE said:OK, I was 12 and walked to the bus stop
Hell, when I was 12 I had to walk a mile and a half to school each day :shrug:
I'd have had to have been pretty damn hurt. It was just me and Mom and she had to work.Penn said:So, you're saying that if your parents knew you had an ailing leg or hip, maybe injured from a football game or other, they'd still send you out to walk a mile and a half to school?
So those of us that believe the parent is responsible are ###holes? I hope I'm not reading that wrong.vraiblonde said:AND even if you help the kid and their parent sues you, it doesn't matter. You can have a clear conscience knowing you still did the right thing. Just because someone else is an ###hole doesn't mean you have to be.
Penn said:".......heck, couldn't the bus driver taken the time to ask the girl her name, and "can I get you some help?", then called the dispatcher, or the school nurse - anyone - to notify the parent?"
For some reason, the driver didn't feel the need, or want to leave the drivers seat and physically go help her.
What the story does not tell us - has this happened in the past to this driver?
Did the driver get called out for leaving his/her seat to attend to somebody?
Could you be *just* a little more cynical? I mean, if you really really tried?PsyOps said:Fact of the matter is, it does matter... While you're being sued, you lose your job, so you are not getting paid, you have to hire a lawyer (have you even had to hire a lawyer vrai? It's not cheap), then go through the humiliation of the court system (ever been there vrai?). Then if you lose, lord knows how much they will take from you. All because the parent couldn't get their child to the bus stop. And you think that will clear your conscience?
The only thing I am "cynical" about is my lack of trust for the kooks that exist out there; the kooks that want to harm our children. I am also cynical about the parents that don't seem to take this very seriously... not until something goes wrong with their kid.vraiblonde said:Could you be *just* a little more cynical? I mean, if you really really tried?
I'd have to be in excruciating pain for that.Penn said:So, you're saying that if your parents knew you had an ailing leg or hip, maybe injured from a football game or other, they'd still send you out to walk a mile and a half to school?
Vrai, wrong country to talk about moral and ethical responsibility.vraiblonde said:I'd have had to have been pretty damn hurt. It was just me and Mom and she had to work.
There are some kids whose Mommies tote and fetch and do everything for them. Then there are kids who are taught to suck it up and take care of their business. Guess which one grows up to be the more resilient adult?
But that doesn't seem like the case here. This kid's Mom is obviously a lazy whiner, and the kid is a whinebag, too. But the bus driver was still wrong to just drive off and leave a kid with a dislocated hip laying at the bus stop. It may not have been his *legal* responsibility, but it was still his moral and ethical responsibility.
This isn't about teaching your kids to be "retards" (as you earlier put it) or teaching them to "take care of their business". This is about parents being responsible for thier own kids. And no one is saying the mother is a lazy whiner. What I'm saying is it's not the bus driver's responsibility to get that kid on the bus.vraiblonde said:I'd have had to have been pretty damn hurt. It was just me and Mom and she had to work.
There are some kids whose Mommies tote and fetch and do everything for them. Then there are kids who are taught to suck it up and take care of their business. Guess which one grows up to be the more resilient adult?
But that doesn't seem like the case here. This kid's Mom is obviously a lazy whiner, and the kid is a whinebag, too. But the bus driver was still wrong to just drive off and leave a kid with a dislocated hip laying at the bus stop. It may not have been his *legal* responsibility, but it was still his moral and ethical responsibility.
We've already discussed what the bus driver should do... It's clear though. You would let a kid who is in obvious pain sit there and fend for themselves.PsyOps said:This isn't about teaching your kids to be "retards" (as you earlier put it) or teaching them to "take care of their business". This is about parents being responsible for thier own kids. And no one is saying the mother is a lazy whiner. What I'm saying is it's not the bus driver's responsibility to get that kid on the bus.
And you said it was the bus driver's "moral and ethical responsibility"? What about the moral and ethical responsibility of the parents? And another question... What should the bus driver have done?
You aren't paying attention. If you read back to a previous post I wrote I said that if I saw a child hurt in the mall or at the bus stop I would do what I could help them, then my next question would be "where is your mom or dad?"AndyMarquisLIVE said:We've already discussed what the bus driver should do... It's clear though. You would let a kid who is in obvious pain sit there and fend for themselves.
Some parents don't have that option. Sorry, mate. That argument just doesn't hold water with me.PsyOps said:You aren't paying attention. If you read back to a previous post I wrote I said that if I saw a child hurt in the mall or at the bus stop I would do what I could help them, then my next question would be "where is your mom or dad?"
If the parent was there you wouldn't have to worry about whether I left the kid there, in pain, to fend for herself.
They don't have the option to watch their own kids; to ensure their safety? You're kidding right?AndyMarquisLIVE said:Some parents don't have that option. Sorry, mate. That argument just doesn't hold water with me.
AndyMarquisLIVE said:Some parents don't have that option. Sorry, mate. That argument just doesn't hold water with me.
Yes, dear - welcome to America and please enjoy your stay.PsyOps said:They don't have the option to watch their own kids; to ensure their safety?