morningbell
hmmmmmm
The article did state that the county did not have any animal controll officers.
then you can look in your phone book under "pest removal" and call them. Common sense is lacking, they're not ok in OK!
The article did state that the county did not have any animal controll officers.
Maybe it was a flying snake. :shrug:I just don't understand how the cop could think that a snake in a tree could be an immenet threat. If they waited a couple hours the snake would have left the tree.
Am I supossed to believe that the snake could have jumped out of the tree at any point and tried to kill them so they shot it?
Manslaughter? It seems to me this was a horrible accident. Certainly there should be some civil reprecussions, and at least the Sgt. should not be a Sgt. But jail for two people who went to do their job and made a mistake? How would jailing these people make it better for these parents. Why would the police be called to that scene anyway. It should have been animal control.
I have never been given any training, nor any officer I work with has been given any training in dealing with snakes.
Also, what would the federal prosecutors charge these guys with?[/QUOTE
And tell me why they should not be charged with negligent homicide, discharging a firearm in a residential area, what state is this legal in? If they were not trained to handle the situation then they should not have been there. They should have said, hmmm I'm not trained to handle snakes let's see if someone else has any ideas, leave it alone and it will probably go away. Nobody can justify firing a gun in a residential area because a snake was stuck in a birdhouse. If Joe Blow did that and killed someone they would be charges with Manslaughter/Negligent Homicide/Unlawful discharge of a firearm in a residential area and who knows what else. But because they are cops they shouldnt be. Why does anybody bother argueing with you it just brings them down to your level and you will win every time, you have more practice being an idiot than the rest of us!
Manslaughter? It seems to me this was a horrible accident. Certainly there should be some civil reprecussions, and at least the Sgt. should not be a Sgt. But jail for two people who went to do their job and made a mistake? How would jailing these people make it better for these parents. Why would the police be called to that scene anyway. It should have been animal control.
I have never been given any training, nor any officer I work with has been given any training in dealing with snakes.
Also, what would the federal prosecutors charge these guys with?[/QUOTE
And tell me why they should not be charged with negligent homicide, discharging a firearm in a residential area, what state is this legal in? If they were not trained to handle the situation then they should not have been there. They should have said, hmmm I'm not trained to handle snakes let's see if someone else has any ideas, leave it alone and it will probably go away. Nobody can justify firing a gun in a residential area because a snake was stuck in a birdhouse. If Joe Blow did that and killed someone they would be charges with Manslaughter/Negligent Homicide/Unlawful discharge of a firearm in a residential area and who knows what else. But because they are cops they shouldnt be. Why does anybody bother argueing with you it just brings them down to your level and you will win every time, you have more practice being an idiot than the rest of us!
Well, genius, if you read the whole story instead of parts, you might get a better education about what happend rather than showing your ignorance by reverting to name calling. You are like these bleeding liberals who want to have part of the truth told but not the part that makes their side look bad! Apparently I am correct, because the Prosecutor was reluctant to charge as well!
Well, genius, if you read the whole story instead of parts, you might get a better education about what happend rather than showing your ignorance by reverting to name calling. You are like these bleeding liberals who want to have part of the truth told but not the part that makes their side look bad! Apparently I am correct, because the Prosecutor was reluctant to charge as well!
No I'm not. Despite your arrogance and your opinion of police, I would never abuse the tools entrusted to me for my own personal gain, or personal intersts. I have integrity, as do most of my fellow officers.
Hmm well I drive a Dark Green, 1996 Saturn SC/2 MD Farm Tags ......... I guess I see how many times I get pulled over now .....
No. You are wrong and you are full of too apparently. I'm not going to point out the exact posts where I KNOW you are full of chit, because I wouldn't want to sully the good name of our police force , but I'm close enough to enough cops to know that you are wrong/lying. And here I tried to back you up on a few occasions , oh well, whatcha going to do right? Cops DO believe they are above the law and they ARE in many cases. If nothing else this cop deserves to be charged for negligent discharge of a firearm, plain and simple.
Cops are never above the law. As a matter of fact, when bad cops comit felonies, it is my opinion that they be punished harsher than those who are not cops. We have an obligation to act in a responsible professional manner.Cops DO believe they are above the law and they ARE in many cases.
Tell me where I lied? Tell me where I'm wrong? The prosecutor saw fit not to charge these guys in the story that was told. The homeowner said beyond the tree there was a field. The cops tried numerous ways to get the snake out to no avail. The cops have no training in how to remove a snake from a tree. I said all along they made a mistake, and there should be some reprecussions, but I oppose the bleeding heart liberals who want them charged with some sort of negligent homicide.
As far as you saying this....
Cops are never above the law. As a matter of fact, when bad cops comit felonies, it is my opinion that they be punished harsher than those who are not cops. We have an obligation to act in a responsible professional manner.
You make no sense! You say you aren't going to print posts where I am full of "chit" but in the same breath you say you don't want to sully the good name of the police. Tell me what I am lying about!
This is illegal, and if I knew of a police officer doing this I would have them charged. So what does this have to do with me? If you know of a police officer doing this, then I would suggest you contact internal affairs.The police regularly use their computer system to look up names for personal interest, be it for their own business dealings, people their children associate with, ect.
Within the last two years, I paid for a speeding ticket I received. Police officers have discretion in how they deal with misdemeanors. I personally have given people from all walks of life breaks on speeding. Cops, Firemen, construction guys, government workers, ALWAYS MILITARY, nurses, doctors etc; So what is your point. Cops in the county I work in have been issued citations for various traffic violations.So you are trying to tell me that other cops do not look the other way when misdemeanors are committed? we're not talking about murders here, I'm saying that cops are above the laws where everyday citizens get penalized (speeding for example).
A cat is a domestic animal. Lets say a Lion was in a tree tree in your back yard. Your children are at home, and there is no animal control available. Do you want us to leave or deal with the situation the best we can. I never said the police made the right decision in this matter, I merely said it doesn't meet the standard where the should be prosecuted. I am not the only person of that opinion, the PROSECUTOR of the county it happned in agreed.as far as the cop not having the proper training....
So lets say a cat was in a tree. I don't believe cops are trained for this. Does that give them the right to shoot it out of the tree?
Read the story again. The homeowner said the snake was hissing at the police. I wasn't there, but I take the snake hissing at people around it as an immenent attack.Now your opinion sounds pretty stupid, doesn't it? There is NO excuse for this cop shooting at a snake that wasn't even attacking anyone.
Now that is just stupid.Even if it had been, it is not like even a quick bite from a venomous snake is going to kill someone instantly...the cop could have simply transported the victim to the hospital
I might agree with this. Again, after the investigation is or was concluded, that may have been the outcome. I am saying the police shouldn't be arrested for murder!If you are a cop that would shoot without knowing everything behind the target then I don't want you on the force
Yea, I'll give you my name, you give me yours. What would the sheriff do? Condemn me for my opinion? All four of the Sheriff's are much smarter than that.You willing to give up your name if that is the case so it can be presented to the Sheriff?
You don't know what these officers were caught up in or not caught up in. Your a child who lives at home, has never had to face the responsibilities of living a life and having other lives depend on you. It's easy for you to sit behind your computer and judge these men, but having no real life experience to back it up.These cops did not follow their training because they were caught up in the moment.
:
But when I make a mistake I don't do it with malice,
lol.I should hope not.
Tell me where I lied? Tell me where I'm wrong? The prosecutor saw fit not to charge these guys in the story that was told. The homeowner said beyond the tree there was a field. The cops tried numerous ways to get the snake out to no avail. The cops have no training in how to remove a snake from a tree. I said all along they made a mistake, and there should be some reprecussions, but I oppose the bleeding heart liberals who want them charged with some sort of negligent homicide.
As far as you saying this....
Cops are never above the law. As a matter of fact, when bad cops comit felonies, it is my opinion that they be punished harsher than those who are not cops. We have an obligation to act in a responsible professional manner.
You make no sense! You say you aren't going to print posts where I am full of "chit" but in the same breath you say you don't want to sully the good name of the police. Tell me what I am lying about!
I am very sad for the family of that little boy. The officer made a BAD mistake and should pay for it. IMO, he should lose his badge, never be given a license to carry a gun, should be charged with involuntary manslaughter, and should sit in jail for awhile thinking about what a tradegy his recklessness caused.
And there's one person on here that has done A LOT of name calling in this entire thread which proves, well..... I don't need to say it. It's obvious!
smcop said:Within the last two years, I paid for a speeding ticket I received. Police officers have discretion in how they deal with misdemeanors. I personally have given people from all walks of life breaks on speeding. Cops, Firemen, construction guys, government workers, ALWAYS MILITARY, nurses, doctors etc; So what is your point. Cops in the county I work in have been issued citations for various traffic violations.
That sums it up, right there.
one more thing I found funny...
so, you DO hold some people above the law then? Interesting legal system we have here...
I don't hold anybody above the law. The State of Maryland gives me discretion as to who I write a ticket to. If someone is serving their country, and they commit a minor traffic violation, I tend to give them a break.That sums it up, right there.
one more thing I found funny...
so, you DO hold some people above the law then? Interesting legal system we have here...
I am very sad for the family of that little boy. The officer made a BAD mistake and should pay for it. IMO, he should lose his badge, never be given a license to carry a gun, should be charged with involuntary manslaughter, and should sit in jail for awhile thinking about what a tradegy his recklessness caused.
And there's one person on here that has done A LOT of name calling in this entire thread which proves, well..... I don't need to say it. It's obvious!