Why can a nine-year-old boy consent to having his penis filleted but not fellated?
Another thing a nine-year-old boy cannot do is to consent to sexual relations with another person. We sensibly deem the nine-year-old brain incapable of granting consent to such an act.
But the people who labeled themselves “woke” until society began associating their chosen label with their nutty ideas, say that a nine-year-old boy – without his parent’s consent or even knowledge – should be able to have his penis amputated. He can get his penis filleted but not fellated.
Amputation of his penis is apparently exempt from the prohibition on mutilating other parts of his body. He still can’t get a tattoo.
Of course, these former wokesters don’t refer to this amputation of a boy’s penis as “penis amputation.” They instead refer to it as “gender affirming” care. This “gender affirming” care is designed to disguise the fact that the boy has a Y chromosome – to disguise the fact that he’s a boy by making him look like a girl
You might think they would put the little boy’s amputated penis into an organ bank for recycling on a little girl who wants the inverse kind of “gender affirming” care. Or you might think they would put the amputated penis into a deep freezer so that it might be re-attached if the little boy changes his mind as he grows up, as little boys are known to do.
But no, the amputated penis gets disposed of as medical waste like a malignant tumor (though I suspect that a few are in specimen jars as trophies on some wokester’s bookcase).