Ah Yes ... Acceptance of Gays - Next Pedo's or Incest

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Edwards vetoed the “Stop Harming Our Kids Act,” a bill that would have prohibited a wide range of transgender procedures on children, including giving girls who identify as boys double mastectomies. It would also have banned giving children cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers.

“Just as conservative courts have found in Alabama, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Arkansas, and Tennessee, I believe that there is no legitimate state interest and no rational basis that justifies harming this very small population of children, their families, and the healthcare who care for them or for the cruel and extreme consequences imposed on children through the overt denial of healthcare by this bill,” Edwards claimed in a letter to Louisiana House Speaker Clay Schexnadyer explaining his veto.

He claimed that the law would be a violation of the 14th Amendment and claimed that lawmakers believing in limited government should not support the bill, which he characterized as part of a “targeted assault on children.”

Despite the governor’s veto, the bill could still have a path forward as there is a supermajority of Republicans in the state’s House and Senate. The bill passed the Senate by a vote of 29-10 and the House by a vote of 75-25.



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
👨‍⚖️ The Supreme Court issued two more fantastic rulings yesterday. National Review ran the first story headlined, “A Supreme Court Victory for Creators of All Kinds.”

In /303 Creative LLC v. Elenis/, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that a creator of wedding websites can legally refuse to design websites for same-sex couples, finding that website design was an artistic act and the equivalent of protected First Amendment speech.

Plaintiff Lori Smith lives in Colorado, which has a law requiring artists to provide services to anyone and anything regardless of the artist’s personal beliefs. Under Colorado law, if the demon Baphomet himself clumped into the store on his iron-shod hooves, Lori would either have to make the devil a Satanic website or face prosecution by a hostile swarm of insectile bureaucrats and regulators angrily boiling out of a bottomless pit somewhere deep under the Denver airport.

Ominously, Lori had lost at the Circuit Court of Appeals, which came up with the novel idea that, since every artist’s work is unique, Lori actually has a “monopoly” on her own special style of website design, and therefore LGBTQ people have NO OTHER REASONABLE OPTIONS for website design. So, sorry, Lori. Get behind the LGBTQ revolution, or else.

But on appeal, the Supreme Court wasn’t having any of it, and said:

In some sense, of course, [Lori’s] voice is unique; so is everyone’s. But that hardly means a State may coopt an individual’s voice for its own purposes. . . . Were the rule otherwise, the better the artist, the finer the writer, the more unique his talent, the more easily his voice could be conscripted to disseminate the government’s preferred messages. That would not respect the First Amendment; more nearly, it would spell its demise.


Outstanding Justice Gorsuch, who wrote the excellent opinion for the majority, also tellingly quoted George Orwell: “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”

Indeed. We can all learn a lesson from that.

The decision naturally extends to cake bakers, wedding planners, and perhaps most importantly, pastors. If you’ve been following the trials and travels of Jack Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado, well, because of this decision, Jack’s never-ending nightmare is now over.

Finally!




 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

White USC professor, 83, refuses to apologize after saying her career would have been better if she was black and lesbian - prompting attendees at female historians conference to walk out

  • Lois Banner, a USC professor, is under fire for recent controversial comments
  • Banner said that her career would be better if she were black and a lesbian
  • The statements caused shock and outrage among those in attendance



Banner, 83, reportedly said she wished she were a lesbian because they had great communities and that her career would have been better if she were black.

'You won't change my mind, I'm 84 years old,' Banner allegedly said, refusing to apologize. Her words were shared by Stephanie Narrow, a student in attendance.

According to conference guests, Banner's antics came just moments after a black professor had spoken on racism and exclusion in the academic space.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Joe Rogan Blasts ‘Forced Compliance’ On Trans Issues: ‘Just F***ing Stop’



Rogan was asked why a company like Bud Light would make a decision like they did in partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney that could “take the company down.”

“I think this was a legitimate public outrage one, where they just pushed too far and people went, ‘f*** you,'” Rogan said.

When talking about a similar situation that Target faces, Rogan noted that Target also “lost billions of dollars, too, because people are sick of this s***.”

“They’re sick of social things like that, that are controversial, getting stuffed in your face, and you have to accept it,” he said. “And people are like, ‘I don’t wanna accept. I’m just coming here for f***ing toilet paper.'”

“They just don’t get it. They think it has to be in everything,” he said. “Because of social media, everybody feels like they’re fighting some sort of social battle with everything they do. And you know, and this is one, this is another one that’s like, it’s like forced compliance. You have to, you’re forced to comply with this.”



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
🔥 And yesterday, a suggestion for job searchers from CNBC:



Stop! Don’t tell them! This was the BEST way to filter out the bad eggs. If someone demands being called by certain pronouns or they’ll file an HR complaint, you can easily imagine how well they’d handle other workplace issues. We should be encouraging the woke to put their pronouns right at the top, right next to their name.

To be fair, the headline overstated the case a little. A secret test using fake resumes found a relatively minor 8% drop in callbacks when resumes included pronouns.

I’d call it a good start.


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
🔥 Finally, enjoy this March 2020 clip of one of the most senior gender dysphoria experts in the country explaining that “affirming” therapies are totally irrational for trans people. Among other things, Dr. Stephen Levine pointed out to the Pennsylvania health committee that, apart from lobotomies, gender affirming treatments are the only surgical interventions ever used to treat psychological conditions:

“Since doctors gave up performing lobotomies to treat psychiatric disorders many decades ago, gender dysphoria is the ONLY psychiatric diagnosis which doctors are attempting to treat by surgery.”







And we know how the whole lobotomy thing turned out. So.



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Attorneys general in several Republican-led states warned Target that “pride” displays and LGBT items at stores could create legal issues for the retail giant, running afoul of child-protection laws in some jurisdictions.

Led by Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, seven attorneys general wrote that the store’s “June Pride” collection could be “potentially harmful to minors” and said that the economic interests of shareholders could suffer due to ensuing boycotts. What’s more, they argued that the items could raise concerns about state child protection or parental rights laws.

“As Attorneys General committed to enforcing our States’ child-protection and parental-rights laws and our States’ economic interests as Target shareholders, we are concerned by recent events involving the company’s ‘Pride’ campaign,” the officials wrote in a letter to Target CEO Brian Cornell. “Our concerns entail the company’s promotion and sale of potentially harmful products to minors, related potential interference with parental authority in matters of sex and gender identity, and possible violation of fiduciary duties by the company’s directors and officers.”

The letter did not indicate what steps the attorneys general might take in their respective states. The letter to Mr. Cornell was signed by Mr. Rokita as well as attorneys general from Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, and South Carolina.




 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
La’Nae Grant, a biological man who identifies as a woman, lectured female inmates on June 20 at the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Women about women’s empowerment and the importance of “inclusivity,” Reduxx reported.

Grant reportedly urged the women to accept that “transgender women are women” and said he thinks “cisgender women” may not immediately accept trans-identifying men due to “competition” for male sexual partners.

Kokila Hiatt, an inmate at the facility, described the event to Reduxx, saying many of the women who attended did not know the event would discuss gender identity.

“Many women behaved in a polite manner by sitting and listening. A lot of people just tuned out. No one was anticipating what this event was really about. It was billed as a Women’s Empowerment Event. His picture was on the sign-up sheet, but this person visibly ‘passes’ as a woman, so no one thought anything of it when they signed up to attend,” Hiatt told Reduxx.


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member





Another commentator who claims to be a nurse wrote: “This is dangerous, and the fact that these health agencies are not putting a stop to this now should tell us everything we need to know about how much they value our safety, and the safety of our babies.”

This does not represent the first time that medical authorities appear to have given in to a man’s fantasies about being a mother. Recently, the Centers for Disease Control released a guidance sheet on biological men “chestfeeding.”

While the National Library of Medicine says that “most reports [on Reglan] have not listed any side effects in nursing infants,” it does not mention the reports that have shown side effects.

Furthermore, “studies have not been done to see if metoclopramide can cause behavior or learning issues for the child.”

The Food and Drug Administration also reports in a medication guide on Reglan that “it is not known if Reglan is safe and works in children.”

Further down on the same medication guide, the FDA says, “It is not known if Reglan will harm your unborn baby … Reglan can pass into breast milk and may harm your baby.”

The FDA tells patients to “not use Reglan for a condition for which it was not prescribed” because in addition to seeping into breast milk it can cause parkinsonism, severe depression, and other mobility problems.



 
Top