White chocolate chips?
Aunt Jemima Aincha Momma!
- Thread starter TPD
- Start date
White chocolate is the Rachel Dolenz of the chocolate world.
Once again, the Onion was on to something...
https://www.foxnews.com/media/the-onion-tweeted-about-aunt-jemimas-removal-hours-before-announcement
https://www.foxnews.com/media/the-onion-tweeted-about-aunt-jemimas-removal-hours-before-announcement
Cracker Jack Changes Name To More Politically Correct Caucasian Jack
babylonbee.com
Cracker Jack Changes Name To More Politically Correct Caucasian Jack
PLANO, TX — When ballparks finally open again, those standing for the traditional seventh-inning stretch will be singing some different lyrics to "Take Me Out to the Ballgame."
babylonbee.com
happyazz
Skiing in the clouds
My guess would be "REAL MAPLE SYRUP".I've never had Krusteaz Pantycakes.
What kind of syrup goes with those?
Lots of white wimmens inject collagen around their mouths so they can have those lips, too
LightRoasted
If I may ...
If I may ...
I love me some Creme Of Wheat, when I was a young'in in the morning. With a pat of butter and salt? Ummmm. Still do.
Louise
Well-Known Member
This is so sad. She is a symbol of comfort and good pancakes.
And, she became very wealthy because of those pancakes. Good for her. It is hard to find that fact on the internet. Go figure. And, her death was being in the wrong place at the wrong time. RIP Aunt Jemima.
LightRoasted
If I may ...
If I may ...
Actually, educated people have an answer.
And don't listen to the people the media focuses on and don't listen to the media story ABOUT the demonstrators.
The police NEED to be abolished. But before your emotions take off with your brain, understand FIRST what police ARE, and understand SECOND what EDUCATED PEOPLE ARE PROPOSING.
First, the LEGAL DEFINITION of "Police Officer" is "Overseer of the labor force". That's the ACTUAL LEGAL DEFINITION. This means that police are, in fact, WHIP CRACKERS over the WORKING CLASS. There's NO WAY to misinterpret that. The police are CORPORATE ENTITIES that enforce UNLAWFUL ordinances and statutes. These unlawful acts carried out BY the police are, in fact, the primary source of problems WITH the police. This is because the corporatization America of has created a system of SUB-law called LEGAL. Legal is below Lawful...and many things which are LEGAL are UNLAWFUL, and in fact the MAJORITY of statutes and ordinances are, in fact, COMPLETELY Unlawful (and, in fact, unconstitutional).
Now, once we can all agree (for the love of God if you can't see, with actual information and knowledge, then you're brainwashed, because that's what knowledge SHOULD do, is alter your ideas and thinking) that what the police represent is, in fact, BAD (and what the police represent IS bad, because they are UNLAWFUL), then we can agree that they should be abolished.
BUT WHAT TO DO WITHOUT POLICE, you ask in sheer terror? Why, you EXPAND THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTS NATIONWIDE. Why? Because the role of the Sheriff is actually SUPPOSED to be "LAW enforcement". Police aren't even SUPPOSED to do "law enforcement". AND the Sheriffs answer to a constitutional election process, meaning we can VOTE THEM OUT. You can't VOTE OUT a police officer.
Now. Argue with pure logic backed by reason AND LAW.
Not my post. I pulled this from another site's comment section.
Actually, educated people have an answer.
And don't listen to the people the media focuses on and don't listen to the media story ABOUT the demonstrators.
The police NEED to be abolished. But before your emotions take off with your brain, understand FIRST what police ARE, and understand SECOND what EDUCATED PEOPLE ARE PROPOSING.
First, the LEGAL DEFINITION of "Police Officer" is "Overseer of the labor force". That's the ACTUAL LEGAL DEFINITION. This means that police are, in fact, WHIP CRACKERS over the WORKING CLASS. There's NO WAY to misinterpret that. The police are CORPORATE ENTITIES that enforce UNLAWFUL ordinances and statutes. These unlawful acts carried out BY the police are, in fact, the primary source of problems WITH the police. This is because the corporatization America of has created a system of SUB-law called LEGAL. Legal is below Lawful...and many things which are LEGAL are UNLAWFUL, and in fact the MAJORITY of statutes and ordinances are, in fact, COMPLETELY Unlawful (and, in fact, unconstitutional).
Now, once we can all agree (for the love of God if you can't see, with actual information and knowledge, then you're brainwashed, because that's what knowledge SHOULD do, is alter your ideas and thinking) that what the police represent is, in fact, BAD (and what the police represent IS bad, because they are UNLAWFUL), then we can agree that they should be abolished.
BUT WHAT TO DO WITHOUT POLICE, you ask in sheer terror? Why, you EXPAND THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTS NATIONWIDE. Why? Because the role of the Sheriff is actually SUPPOSED to be "LAW enforcement". Police aren't even SUPPOSED to do "law enforcement". AND the Sheriffs answer to a constitutional election process, meaning we can VOTE THEM OUT. You can't VOTE OUT a police officer.
Now. Argue with pure logic backed by reason AND LAW.
Thanks I was going to make that point ........ trying to be Kim K 1000's of Instragram ' models ' have those big fake lips
Grits = Butter and Sugar
Cream of Wheat = Milk / Cream and Sugar
Oatmeal = Milk and Sugar
You changing the names will just create another problem. You can't change them into a white person. That'll just create another more controversy. Even changing it to the tree it comes from name would make them upset. I'm sure if it changed to a number or symbol would cause problems. We should all just give up pancakes & waffles.
BOP
Well-Known Member
BOP
Well-Known Member
Or, as Vrai pointed out, they're just casting about for chit to bust up.
BOP
Well-Known Member
Molasses - for the slow talkin' brotha in you.I've never had Krusteaz Pantycakes.
What kind of syrup goes with those?