Dad tosses 4 kids to their death

B

Bronwyn

Guest
Retroactive abortion.

When you make it public policy that people are allowed to kill their children legally, the next step is...well, this sort of thing. We have cheapened life in this country to the point that it has literally no value. Look at China and other countries that have used infanticide as population control. Life has no value there, so history is merely repeating itself here.

This is what happens when you let Socialists/Commies take over your government.

Hmmmm
 

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
Ever hear of something called "partial-birth abortion"? It is, indeed, currently legal to murder a child, as long as it hasn't been technically born yet.

I agree with you. But there are societal consequences for that convenience.

If the mother of those children had aborted them, none of you would think a thing of it, or even know about it. But because the parent waited a few years, suddenly it's barbaric and awful.

But the fact remains that those kids would be dead either way.

I'm not going to argue with you, because I really don't want to get into another pointless abortion debate, especially if you think a father throwing a child off a bridge is the same thing as a doctor performing an abortion.

Hell, if you're going to use that argument, all murder is ok...because the victim's mother could have aborted him/her. :rolleyes:
 

chernmax

NOT Politically Correct!!
Can't they just find a higher bridge to throw him off of???

This looks like a good start...:coffee: He'll probably get tired of screaming before impacting the ground...:howdy:
 

Attachments

  • millau_viaduct.jpg
    millau_viaduct.jpg
    72 KB · Views: 72
Last edited:

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
Help me understand how it's different, when the end result is the same?

I can't help you understand. We have different opinions on abortion. :shrug: There's no use in :deadhorse:.


Do you think there's a difference in a person setting a dog on fire and letting it burn to death, or having it euthanized by a vet?
 
T

toppick08

Guest
I can't help you understand. We have different opinions on abortion. :shrug: There's no use in :deadhorse:.


Do you think there's a difference in a person setting a dog on fire and letting it burn to death, or having it euthanized by a vet?

Animals vs. Humans?..come on now Cowgirl.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Do you think there's a difference in a person setting a dog on fire and letting it burn to death, or having it euthanized by a vet?

Ah. But when an animal is euthanized, the doc gives it a shot. He doesn't pierce its skull with scissors, then suck the brain out (as with partial-birth abortion).

So a more accurate comparison would be: which is worse - setting a dog on fire, or stabbing it in the skull and sucking its brains out?
 

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
Animals vs. Humans?..come on now Cowgirl.

I was making a comparison. :rolleyes:

Ah. But when an animal is euthanized, the doc gives it a shot. He doesn't pierce its skull with scissors, then suck the brain out (as with partial-birth abortion).

So a more accurate comparison would be: which is worse - setting a dog on fire, or stabbing it in the skull and sucking its brains out?

Why is it that pro-life people always use partial-birth abortions in their examples? The majority of abortions are early-term abortions.

Anyways, I'm going to end this discussion now. I don't have the patience to debate today. :howdy:
 

High EGT

Gort! Klaatu barada nikto
I agree with you. But there are societal consequences for that convenience.
If the mother of those children had aborted them, none of you would think a thing of it, or even know about it. But because the parent waited a few years, suddenly it's barbaric and awful.

But the fact remains that those kids would be dead either way.

My social dilemma is I could never imagine looking thru the eyes of one of these children or even spend a day walking in their shoes and at the same time walk the moral high ground that would mandate these kids be born into these type circumstances. To be blunt I truly believe we at times treat pets more humanly then of our own kind.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
My social dilemma is I could never imagine looking thru the eyes of one of these children or even spend a day walking in their shoes and at the same time walk the moral high ground that would mandate these kids be born into these type circumstances.

THIS is why I'm pro-abortion. But there are consequences for that mentality, and we are realizing them.
 

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
No, we don't. I have stated many times that I am pro-abortion. I just prefer to be honest and call it what it is, rather than hide behind words like "choice".


Yes, we do have differing opinions. I think calling pro-abortion is wrong. I'm pro-choice. I may not agree with abortion (I definitely don't agree with partial-term, unless it's medically necessary), but I still think women should be able to choose. :shrug:
 

ewashkow

New Member
Ever hear of something called "partial-birth abortion"? It is, indeed, currently legal to murder a child, as long as it hasn't been technically born yet.

I am pro choice but am 100% AGAINST partial birth. When the time comes that partial birth can be preformed (20-26 weeks), the baby has a very viable chance of survival without the mother. Unfortunately, in the eyes of the law, partial birth abortion is just as legal as the standard abortion since they are both abortions.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
If you support someone's right to rape another human being without repurcussion, would you consider yourself pro-choice or pro-rape?
 

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
Yeah, pro-choice to have an abortion. Therefore you are pro-abortion.

Why is it so hard to be honest?

:lmao: Vrai, I HONESTLY would not say I'm pro-abortion. I don't WANT babies to be killed.....but I WANT women to have the CHOICE. Can I make that any clearer?
 
Top