Dad tosses 4 kids to their death

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
How can you be pro-choice when you have a decided preference as to which choice is made?

because you can be BOTH pro-choice and pro-abortion...and technically, thought i'm not sure how it would work, you could be both pro-choice and pro-life...but you do not have to be pro-abortion to be pro-choice.

basically, someone can be pro-choice JUST because they are "an american" and don't want to see someone's right to choose taken away. That does not mean they support abortion per se, but they support the laws that are allowing someone to make the decision based on their own circumstances, not making them be FORCED to have a child they don't want.


get it yet? i'm almost done typing about it because you're being hardheaded...but we're here to teach you :lmao:
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
That does not mean they support abortion per se, but they support the laws that are allowing someone to make the decision based on their own circumstances, not making them be FORCED to have a child they don't want.

get it yet? i'm almost done typing about it because you're being hardheaded...but we're here to teach you :lmao:
Who forces someone to have sex? 'Cuz, the scientists have figured out where that whole pregnancy comes from nowadays. You make the "choice" to have a child when you have sex, not after you're pregnant. At least, you make the choice to risk having a child.

After that, the choice is to murder the child, or not. Allowing someone that choice is, frankly, insane. I mean, why not allow it up 'til the kid is 18? (hint: I know the answer is that it's murder. It's the same answer after the mother is pregnant)
 

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
Who forces someone to have sex? 'Cuz, the scientists have figured out where that whole pregnancy comes from nowadays. You make the "choice" to have a child when you have sex, not after you're pregnant. At least, you make the choice to risk having a child.

After that, the choice is to murder the child, or not. Allowing someone that choice is, frankly, insane. I mean, why not allow it up 'til the kid is 18? (hint: I know the answer is that it's murder. It's the same answer after the mother is pregnant)

that mass of tissue has less intelligence than an ant.

I sure hope you don't squish bugs :smile:

now yall have fun with the abortion debate because i'm not getting into it. I was simply trying to explain to the board mama that life isn't black and white :buddies:


Edit

o, and just to answer your question about "who forces someone to have sex"...its called rape and its a crime. :yay:
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
that mass of tissue has less intelligence than an ant.

I sure hope you don't squish bugs :smile:

now yall have fun with the abortion debate because i'm not getting into it. I was simply trying to explain to the board mama that life isn't black and white :buddies:


Edit

o, and just to answer your question about "who forces someone to have sex"...its called rape and its a crime. :yay:
Rape is a crime, and accounts for less than 1% of abortion. Murder is a crime too, to answer your question about "choice".

If intelligence is the issue, is it okay to kill dumb people? Or, those with severe mental problems? Is that just "choice"?
 

theArtistFormerlyKnownAs

Well-Known Member
Rape is a crime, and accounts for less than 1% of abortion. Murder is a crime too, to answer your question about "choice".

If intelligence is the issue, is it okay to kill dumb people? Or, those with severe mental problems? Is that just "choice"?

:lalala:

Told you i'm not discussing it.

You asked "who forces someone to have sex"...and I answered you. A rapist.

and now I stop discussing the abortion topic at all :yay:
 

Plan B

New Member
Who forces someone to have sex? 'Cuz, the scientists have figured out where that whole pregnancy comes from nowadays. You make the "choice" to have a child when you have sex, not after you're pregnant. At least, you make the choice to risk having a child.

After that, the choice is to murder the child, or not. Allowing someone that choice is, frankly, insane. I mean, why not allow it up 'til the kid is 18? (hint: I know the answer is that it's murder. It's the same answer after the mother is pregnant)

Abortion is murder.
It is allowed for the same reason capital punishment is, tho it is also murder.
If having sex means you must want/have a baby, then supporting capital execution means you support murder ( to yr line of thinking). When a felon murders another person, it dont mean he wants to be executed...
 

libby

New Member
Retroactive abortion.

When you make it public policy that people are allowed to kill their children legally, the next step is...well, this sort of thing. We have cheapened life in this country to the point that it has literally no value. Look at China and other countries that have used infanticide as population control. Life has no value there, so history is merely repeating itself here.

This is what happens when you let Socialists/Commies take over your government.

AMEN TO THAT!!
 

godsbutterfly

Free to Fly
This is effing crazy!!!!
"Father Charged with Murdering Kids"

Seems he tossed his 4 kids off an 80' high bridge to their death....

What is going on with all these parents killing their kids?

I didn't see any remorse at all on that man's face for throwing those four little children to their deaths. What could they possibly have done wrong to deserve this except for exist? He has to be totally heartless to do such a thing. The more I read of things like this the more convinced I am that Satan is alive and well and walking the earth in the guise of these cold-hearted monsters.
 

LexiGirl75

100% Goapele Head!
This is amazing. What is the world coming to. They say things come in three's but this is sick and very devastating. May all of their souls be at peace.

This goes back to what I was saying the other day about how chidlren are allowed to just leave the hospital and go home with parents without any question to their mental health. Not to say that people can't snap later but there really are some parents who don't need to be parents. At the same time these people don't need to be around anyone.
 

LexiGirl75

100% Goapele Head!
Yeah, pro-choice to have an abortion. Therefore you are pro-abortion.

Why is it so hard to be honest?

I've never heard it called that, you confused me for about 4 pages (reading from end to beginning). I thought the whole time you were saying you were pro-life. So, does being pro-abortion mean you're against life? :confused: I will keep reading and/or use Google. :whistle:
 

LexiGirl75

100% Goapele Head!
Help me understand how it's different, when the end result is the same?

One difference is that those children can live outside of the womb on their own. An embryo or unfully develioped fetus can not survive on it's own without a miracle (no machines). However, the parents decision (though late) and more so the father's decision to not keep the children (afterall?) is the same end result.
 

Dye Tied

Garden Variety Gnome
I've never heard it called that, you confused me for about 4 pages (reading from end to beginning). I thought the whole time you were saying you were pro-life. So, does being pro-abortion mean you're against life? :confused: I will keep reading and/or use Google. :whistle:

It's pro choice. No matter which you choose, it IS your choice.
 
Top