Lichtman has a system where he applies true or false questions to 13 questions. if there are six or more false answers, the challenger -- in this case, former President Donald Trump -- would win. But Lichtman has interpreted his keys and he's predicting Kamala Harris will win.
This is how he's
interpreted the keys:
- Party Mandate: After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than it did after the previous midterm elections. FALSE
- Contest: There is no serious contest for the incumbent-party nomination. TRUE
- Incumbency: The incumbent-party candidate is the sitting president. FALSE
- Third-party: There is no significant third-party or independent campaign. TRUE
- Short-term economy: The economy is not in recession during the election campaign. TRUE
- Long-term economy: Real per-capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms. TRUE
- Policy change: The incumbent administration effects [sic] major changes in national policy. TRUE
- Social unrest: There is no sustained social unrest during the term. TRUE
- Scandal: The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal. TRUE
- Incumbent charisma: The incumbent-party candidate is charismatic or a national hero. FALSE
- Challenger charisma: The challenging-party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero. TRUE
- Foreign/military failure: The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
- Foreign/military success: The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
Now, I have a few questions here.
He explained at the beginning of September that he has not answered 12 and 13 yet, because he said he thinks that could flip. But he said even if they flip, that's only five answers that would be false. But the answers to both would seem clearly to be both false at this point, since Biden-Harris had a huge military failure in Afghanistan and no success.
Then on top of that, number 11, Trump is undeniably charismatic. That would be six "true" answers, right there. We could also argue about "sustained social unrest" with radical Gaza protesters or the questions of "significant independent" with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. throwing his support to Trump.
But Silver had a few things to say, when Lichtman seemed to imply that Silver was coming around to agree with his prediction about Harris:
That ticked off Lichtman, who said Silver didn't know "how to apply [his] keys":