crabcake said:You didn't even read the article, did ya?
Not yet no. I can almost predict what is says though
crabcake said:You didn't even read the article, did ya?
THAT is 100% true! For me, when it comes to medical issues, I won't even entertain something that doesn't come from someone with at least some medical background/education/training.kwillia said:I can't say whether he is right or wrong. I'm just pointing out that "information" on the web can be found to either prove or disprove just about any subject... it all depends on what slant one wants to look for...:shrug:
PrepH4U said:Doesn't have to be Lake Erie! Pregnant mom's who eat fish & seafood could be a great factor.
Don't bother; you said earlier it was impossible for you to appear a bigger ass than you already have.tomchamp said:Not yet no. I can almost predict what is says though
K_Jo said::tomcruise:
K_Jo said::tomcruise:
crabcake said:Don't bother; you said earlier it was impossible for you to appear a bigger ass than you already have.
The extent of ones "ass-ness" is limitless, IMO. If you want to prove me right, you just go right ahead. :shrug:tomchamp said:Wanna bet?
crabcake said:The extent of ones "ass-ness" is limitless, IMO. If you want to prove me right, you just go right ahead. :shrug:
I have no idea what you're talking about. Nevertheless, this thread was originally started to alert parents who might be interested to know about a long-awaited solution to medication issues for their kids. If you have nothing of value to add (which, thus far, you haven't), you're not a physician, and you don't have kids, why not go post your elsewhere and try and make someone laugh. :shrug:tomchamp said:The forum world has seen it from both of us.
crabcake said:I have no idea what you're talking about. Nevertheless, this thread was originally started to alert parents who might be interested to know about a long-awaited solution to medication issues for their kids. If you have nothing of value to add (which, thus far, you haven't), you're not a physician, and you don't have kids, why not go post your elsewhere and try and make someone laugh. :shrug:
No, I didn't.tomchamp said:Come on you laughed at me somewhere in this thread.
crabcake said:No, I didn't.
And I pity you.tomchamp said:Thanks. I laughed at you!
crabcake said:And I pity you.
That's it; I'm a lair. Thanks for clearing that up for me.tomchamp said:You lair. You hope I die!
crabcake said:That's it; I'm a lair. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
There is another equally plausible (some might even say more plausible) explanation - one that Mr. Olmsted has apparently dismissed, since he had it right in his hands. The Amish, and their neighbors the Mennonites, have been studied by geneticists for some time because they are a genetically isolated community. Although they accept converts, they don't get very many and so they don't get much "new blood" (genes). In addition, they don't move around much and their members tend to marry within the community - those who don't often leave and join their "English" (as they call people outside their communities, regardless of ethnicity) spouse outside of the community.
In genetic terms, what is happening is called "inbreeding" - and it has some very predictable results. One of these is that some variations of genes are lost and other variations become more common. There is a tendency to genetic uniformity, with only a few of the possible variations remaining. Among the Amish and Mennonites, the result has been a dramatic rise in genetic disorders that are more rare in the general population (see here, here and here) as a result of this rise in frequency of the "abnormal" variations of several genes.