I'm at a loss for words.

ICit

ICit

Jam out with ur clam out
sockgirl77 said:
I'm not, even though he was a complete idiot for posting it on FB. As I said in an earlier post, he's COUNTY and has a COUNTY lawyer. He'll walk away completely unscathed.
Click to expand...
fines and a few hours of CS.... thats it!
 
Hank

Hank

my war
sockgirl77 said:
I'm not, even though he was a complete idiot for posting it on FB. As I said in an earlier post, he's COUNTY and has a COUNTY lawyer. He'll walk away completely unscathed.
Click to expand...
No doubt. St. Mary's is the catch and release King. If they are releasing the clowns they release now, this should be a slap on the wrist.
 
Hank

Hank

my war
His lawyer is good. All these charges were dropped in his last run-in w/ the law.

Driving While Intoxicated, Possession Controlled Dangerous Substance – Marijuana and Possession Paraphernalia, Possession Unregistered Rifle/Shotgun, Concealment: Dangerous Weapon, Handgun in Vehicle.
 
sockgirl77

sockgirl77

Well-Known Member
Hank said:
His lawyer is good. All these charges were dropped in his last run-in w/ the law.

Driving While Intoxicated, Possession Controlled Dangerous Substance – Marijuana and Possession Paraphernalia, Possession Unregistered Rifle/Shotgun, Concealment: Dangerous Weapon, Handgun in Vehicle.
Click to expand...
Name:SLADE, DANIEL A.M.
Connection:pRIVATE ATTORNEY FOR DEFENSE


Former judge's son...


He walked away with NO jail time and NO fines.
 
sockgirl77

sockgirl77

Well-Known Member
After a thorough investigation was conducted, the case was reviewed by State’s Attorney’s Office personnel. As a result, charges against Woodburn were applied for by Detective Corporal M. Boyer from the Criminal Investigations Division and a criminal summons was issued. On April 20, 2014, Woodburn was charged with Aggravated Cruelty to Animal, Animal Cruelty, and Reckless Endangerment.
Click to expand...
http://firstsheriff.blogspot.com/2014/04/woodburn-charged-with-animal-cruelty.html

This should make pit advocates and irresponsible pet owner advocates all warm and fuzzy.
 
SoMDGirl42

SoMDGirl42

Well-Known Member
I'm glad it's a dead dog and not a dead kid everyone is arguing over. If the shoe was reversed and the dog killed a kid at the daycare, you all would be out to hang the dog owner for repeating to let her dog run free. It's the dog owners fault the dog is dead, period. If it wasn't running loose, he would not have shot it.

I know first hand the damage a dog can cause to another animial/human. Why aren't the parents of the kids at the daycare concerned about their kids welfare with this dog running loose next to the daycare?
 
sockgirl77

sockgirl77

Well-Known Member
SoMDGirl42 said:
I'm glad it's a dead dog and not a dead kid everyone is arguing over. If the shoe was reversed and the dog killed a kid at the daycare, you all would be out to hang the dog owner for repeating to let her dog run free. It's the dog owners fault the dog is dead, period. If it wasn't running loose, he would not have shot it.

I know first hand the damage a dog can cause to another animial/human. Why aren't the parents of the kids at the daycare concerned about their kids welfare with this dog running loose next to the daycare?
Click to expand...
I've stated that. None of the parents seem concerned that the "daycare" provider allowed the dog on her property, deeming it her ####ing mascot. Nor were these parents concerned that the kids were outside in the rain crying on the mascot's grave that the "daycare" provider allowed to be placed in her "daycare" yard.
 
SoMDGirl42

SoMDGirl42

Well-Known Member
sockgirl77 said:
I've stated that. None of the parents seem concerned that the "daycare" provider allowed the dog on her property, deeming it her ####ing mascot. Nor were these parents concerned that the kids were outside in the rain crying on the mascot's grave that the "daycare" provider allowed to be placed in her "daycare" yard.
Click to expand...
The parents would have thrown a clot if the dog had bitten one of them.

People are just stupid. And the one who started all the trouble with "justice for tank" getting people all rung up about him shooting the dog is a bit loco. Not a bit, but maybe a straight whack a doodle.
 
Chris0nllyn

Chris0nllyn

Well-Known Member
sockgirl77 said:
I've stated that. None of the parents seem concerned that the "daycare" provider allowed the dog on her property, deeming it her ####ing mascot. Nor were these parents concerned that the kids were outside in the rain crying on the mascot's grave that the "daycare" provider allowed to be placed in her "daycare" yard.
Click to expand...
Have you talked to any of the parents or are you basing that off the FB postings?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top