So we have to wait until the dog actually attacks and injures someone or a pet before we can take action, is that correct?
What's the point of that? By then it's a little late, don't you think?
Uh...no......where did i say that?
What i meant was every situation is different. The shepherd was an active threat and deadly force was warranted in that situation because his dog and/or child was in danger. If an animal (ANY animal) is actively threatening me or mine - then it's my right (duty) to respond with as force much as necessary to diffuse that threat. PERIOD.
If a dog is running willey-nilley in my yard and all it's doing is pooping on my petunias, i'm not gonna shoot it, but I will either call animal control or set a live trap and catch it myself and take it to animal control, because it shouldn't be running loose - it could have rabies, mange, worms yada yada so my dogs are at risk by virtue of it's presence. But I'm not gonna shoot it just because it's a pit bull who has a fondness for my petunias. Now if said doggie is trying to bite my precious pupper or eat her kibble and bares his pearly whites at me for getting between him and her....game on - Sorry dude - I gotta back hoe and i know how to use it. Same is said for a human intruder. Just sayin'...