What is so honorable about choosing to die when you leave behind life/lives that you created?
How about the soldier that goes into battle?
What is so honorable about choosing to die when you leave behind life/lives that you created?
And why would someone choose to be a part of a religion that would rather have a mother die than live and raise her babies? What is so honorable about choosing to die when you leave behind life/lives that you created?
How about the soldier that goes into battle?
How would you all feel if it was the twins that needed the blood transfusion, and the parents refused, thereby killing the two newborns?
Religion is foolish TO YOU. Obviously not to her.
And again I ask the question: do you have a belief that is so important to you that you would die for it?
I think people should be able to decide whether they want certain medical treatments or not, for whatever reason. If you can't be in charge of your own body, what the hell CAN you be in charge of?
I don't think anyone has any call to criticize this woman for her decision.
I believe that is exactly what it is about. If she received a transfusion, she'd be banished from (as vrai said) the Pearly Gates. By her belief, she's probably through the Pearly Gates and watching down on her children, who if they follow the same beliefs, will join her one day.I don't find it odd that a mother would die FOR her children, but that's not the case here.
Do you have a belief that's strong enough you'd die for it?
I can't think of any belief that I would die for.
How about the soldier that goes into battle?
What if someone held a gun to your head and said, "Molest a child or I'll kill you"?
What if they said, "Kill your own mother or I'll kill you"?
The only thing I believe strongly enough to die for would be my children.
I believe that is exactly what it is about. If she received a transfusion, she'd be banished from (as vrai said) the Pearly Gates. By her belief, she's probably through the Pearly Gates and watching down on her children, who if they follow the same beliefs, will join her one day.
Parents have the right to refuse medical treatment on behalf of their children.
And, considering she's a JW and all, I suspect she would feel that a transfusion would prevent them from entering the Pearly Gates, and would opt for everlasting life.
However, she DIDN'T refuse treatment for her children - just for herself. So let's keep it to the facts, shall we?
I believe that is exactly what it is about. If she received a transfusion, she'd be banished from (as vrai said) the Pearly Gates. By her belief, she's probably through the Pearly Gates and watching down on her children, who if they follow the same beliefs, will join her one day.
Well, maybe without her guidance, the kids will grow up and not believe in the same things she does...so what if they never get to the Pearly Gates to join her?
Who is to say your beliefs (or mine) will guarantee us into the Pearly Gates? I'm not going to bash someone for their beliefs, even if I don't agree with them.Well, maybe without her guidance, the kids will grow up and not believe in the same things she does...so what if they never get to the Pearly Gates to join her?
I'm not going to bash someone for their beliefs, even if I don't agree with them.
But she didn't choose to die. She trusted that the church teachings were based on a correct interpretation of the Bible which they were not.I just find it odd that a mother would choose to die over choosing to raise her children. I don't find it odd that a mother would die FOR her children, but that's not the case here.
I can't think of any belief that I would die for. :shrug: