Jehovah's Witness mother of twins refuses blood transfusion then dies.

Chasey_Lane

Salt Life
And why would someone choose to be a part of a religion that would rather have a mother die than live and raise her babies? What is so honorable about choosing to die when you leave behind life/lives that you created?

Some people are born into religion and raised to know no other way.
 

wxtornado

The Other White Meat
How would you all feel if it was the twins that needed the blood transfusion, and the parents refused, thereby killing the two newborns?
 

~mellabella~

New Member
How about the soldier that goes into battle?

Interesting. I think it all depends on your view as to whether or not the cause was worth it. Some people don't think these soldiers deaths are honorable. But their family members do. Same here. Many people think this was a senseless death. But to those who share her beliefs, she is a martyr.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
How would you all feel if it was the twins that needed the blood transfusion, and the parents refused, thereby killing the two newborns?

Parents have the right to refuse medical treatment on behalf of their children.

And, considering she's a JW and all, I suspect she would feel that a transfusion would prevent them from entering the Pearly Gates, and would opt for everlasting life.

However, she DIDN'T refuse treatment for her children - just for herself. So let's keep it to the facts, shall we?
 

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
Religion is foolish TO YOU. Obviously not to her.

And again I ask the question: do you have a belief that is so important to you that you would die for it?

I just find it odd that a mother would choose to die over choosing to raise her children. I don't find it odd that a mother would die FOR her children, but that's not the case here.


I can't think of any belief that I would die for. :shrug:
 

Larry Gude

Strung Out
Here...

I think people should be able to decide whether they want certain medical treatments or not, for whatever reason. If you can't be in charge of your own body, what the hell CAN you be in charge of?

I don't think anyone has any call to criticize this woman for her decision.

...here.

Besides that, there are claims that, what, 100,000 or more people die, every year, from mistakes made in the hospital, which is more death than than auto accidents. If she is a loon, so be it, but doing whatever the hospital says is no guarantee in the first place.
 

Chasey_Lane

Salt Life
I don't find it odd that a mother would die FOR her children, but that's not the case here.
I believe that is exactly what it is about. If she received a transfusion, she'd be banished from (as vrai said) the Pearly Gates. By her belief, she's probably through the Pearly Gates and watching down on her children, who if they follow the same beliefs, will join her one day. :smile:
 

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
How about the soldier that goes into battle?

:shrug: I find it sad that soldiers are dying and leaving children behind, but they weren't 100% sure they'd die. Not every soldier dies in battle. I wonder how many soldiers would go into battle if they *knew* they were definitely going to be killed.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
I believe that is exactly what it is about. If she received a transfusion, she'd be banished from (as vrai said) the Pearly Gates. By her belief, she's probably through the Pearly Gates and watching down on her children, who if they follow the same beliefs, will join her one day. :smile:

And there you have it.

All these "It Takes a Village" busybodies need to worry about their own lives and stop trying to control everyone else's.
 

wxtornado

The Other White Meat
Parents have the right to refuse medical treatment on behalf of their children.

And, considering she's a JW and all, I suspect she would feel that a transfusion would prevent them from entering the Pearly Gates, and would opt for everlasting life.

However, she DIDN'T refuse treatment for her children - just for herself. So let's keep it to the facts, shall we?

I agree with you in that she had every right to make the choices that she did, regardless of how mindlessly stupid they are. Every time a JW commits passive suicide, I don't think it's a major loss. I think we should just give her her Darwin Award (posthumously), put the children into a good foster or adoptive home (with sane parents this time), and move on.

I think it is too bad that the children survived her: they will grow up with a double dose of this bullsh1t because of her "martyrdom". It's rather a pity that Dad didn't bleed out too, but some things cannot be rushed.
 

Cowgirl

Well-Known Member
I believe that is exactly what it is about. If she received a transfusion, she'd be banished from (as vrai said) the Pearly Gates. By her belief, she's probably through the Pearly Gates and watching down on her children, who if they follow the same beliefs, will join her one day. :smile:

Well, maybe without her guidance, the kids will grow up and not believe in the same things she does...so what if they never get to the Pearly Gates to join her? :smile:
 

Chasey_Lane

Salt Life
Well, maybe without her guidance, the kids will grow up and not believe in the same things she does...so what if they never get to the Pearly Gates to join her? :smile:
Who is to say your beliefs (or mine) will guarantee us into the Pearly Gates? I'm not going to bash someone for their beliefs, even if I don't agree with them.
 

awpitt

Main Streeter
I just find it odd that a mother would choose to die over choosing to raise her children. I don't find it odd that a mother would die FOR her children, but that's not the case here.


I can't think of any belief that I would die for. :shrug:
But she didn't choose to die. She trusted that the church teachings were based on a correct interpretation of the Bible which they were not.
 
Top