Originally posted by Ken King
I've just looked at the Zapruder film again (too frapping big to post here) and it sure as heck looks as if the impact came from somewhere in front and to the right of the President.
![Laughing :lmao: :lmao:](/styles/somd_smilies/lmao.gif)
Originally posted by Ken King
I've just looked at the Zapruder film again (too frapping big to post here) and it sure as heck looks as if the impact came from somewhere in front and to the right of the President.
Originally posted by Larry Gude
...there were several tests done and he details them, proving how EASY it was to do. He also documents Ozzie working on the shot at a shooting range several times.
I can do a chest sized 100 yard shot moving straight away from me, 2 out of 3, open sight, bolt action, in 6 seconds E-Z. Oz used a scope. Oswald also qualified as marksman in the Marines though all qualify or they kill you. He had more than enough basic marksmanship skill.
The alledged shot(s) from the grassy knoll would have been far tougher shots. The alledged shot from out front is no exactly what someone would plan UNLESS they intended for there to be questions of competency. Shots through windshields aren't particularly accurate.
There is no legitimate question that he could have done it.
Bullet #1 goes through JFK's neck then into the governor.
No Larry, we will believe what we see.Originally posted by Larry Gude
...gonna believe what they want but FWIW...
Maybe we are seeing a different film, first there is a hit as you can see Kennedy reaches up to his throat and Jackie is responding to that hit. Connelly rotates in his seat. No data to support which shot this was from the film, it could have been the first shot or a second shot. For argument sake we will call it shot 1.From the Zap film:
Connelly obviously hears and reacts to a shot from behind (miss)
Explain the time lag from Kennedy's hands going to his neck until Connelly reacts. If this was a continuation of the first shot are you contending that it delayed a second or two after hitting Kennedy until it hit Connelly? Next hit observed is just before the hit to the head. You see Connelly straightening in the seat and then falling over from the strike to the right rear of his torso.Jack obviously gets shot through the neck from behind (hit #1)
then the round goes into Connelly, Jack barely reacts forward and this is more from clutching at his wound than the force of the bullet. There is little resistance so no pressure builds up. The energy is not conserved, it exits.
This is hit three and almost immediately after Connelly is hit, plus the additional missed shot that was featured in the Warren report now this gives us at least four shots being fired.Jack gets hit in the back of the head (hit #2)
The bullet easily penetrates, as did the neck shot, barely moving Jack at all BUT the neck shot met little resistance and exited him intact. The head shot penetrates, starts coming apart because it hit something hard and fragments work towards the front, piercing his skull and starting a chain reaction.
Give me a break, if this was the case how did the trailing motorcycle cop and Secret Service agent get blood and brain matter sprayed upon them? What would have happened if a head shot from the front was from a mercury loaded round (aka explosive bullet)?In the mean time, all this energy has built up, conservation of energy, in an instant and MUST go somewhere, path of least resistance, bums rush out the front EXPLODING his head and forcing him back. Fragments and a shower of blood flying forward under pressure absolutely preclude this from being a frontal shot.
Fragments from the front that are just coming free fly backwards with him. He is a horrible mess.
The film makes it clear to me that it didn't happen the way you see it.At no time in the Zap film does anyone look toward the camera because all the shots came from behind.
The film, to me, is clear, the front of his head comes apart, not the back. All the people who swear it was the back are simply wrong according to the tape.
Like the magic bullet?Originally posted by Tonio
All that may be true. What I'm saying (and what I believe Larry might be saying, too) is that there are emotional motivations behind conspiracies that take precedence over the facts in people's minds. After a certain point, people see what they want to see and believe what they want to believe. They ignore or spin away any contrary evidence.
Originally posted by Larry Gude
...how the hell can I keep the conspiracy going if I keep getting outed? Time to take you for a limo ride...
REMEBER EVERYONE: Steve was NEVER here!!!
I was wondering about that, too - how he could be rump shakin' with all those girls with his back problems.Originally posted by Bruzilla
Anyone who was in that bad a shape was unlikely to be out banging starlets while Jackie wasn't looking.