I do enjoy checking this thread every once in awhile just to get a chuckle.
JPC, if you don't make it to Governor, will you run for President in 2012? Please?
JPC, if you don't make it to Governor, will you run for President in 2012? Please?
It would actually be easier to run for President if I first get elected as Governor, so I figure to keep my expectations on the positive side.JPC, if you don't make it to Governor, will you run for President in 2012? Please?
It would actually be easier to run for President if I first get elected as Governor, so I figure to keep my expectations on the positive side.
And I like President Obama so I would have that reason to wait for my second term as Governor and run for Pres in 2016.
That seems like a better plan to me.
My actions (crimes) were not impulsive at all because I though about it first each time and worked out the best wording that I wanted to spray paint and then pick the time to do it and everything was done by calculation.Lets draw lines in the sand!
I guess knowing that, it would be a very scary thought of giving you power (over my tax dollars no less) of what crooked crap you would do, giving your impulsive actions, you know.
Greetings.
I just want to introduce myself as being the next Governor of the State of Maryland.
Campaign website is HERE.
The registration with the State Board of Elections was done on Tuesday.
My name is James P. Cusick Sr., but I will be listed on the Democratic Party election ballot as just "J.P. Cusick", as I see that having a better ring to it.
Democrats rock!
Actually he can use his iniitials and surname http://www.elections.state.md.us/forms/documents/candidateinfosheet_000.pdf all he needed to do was file http://www.elections.state.md.us/pdf/alternate_name_affidavit.pdf . And as a matter of fact he is listed as Cusick, J.P. here.You'll only be listed as J.P. if you legally change your name. James P. Sr is your legal name, so that is what election laws requires. No nicknames or titles.
Their influence in insignificant; all that really matters is the result... that you lost. And will do so again.And no one really knows if the Forum has any real influence or not, and I did do Newspaper ads and public events / debates and those might be more influential but that is not known for certain either.
I'm surprised you didn't whip out your ignorant claim that no custodial ever willingly abandons their family, even when a textbook case is right in your face.The saying that he was drinking and partying and womanizing means the Man had big unresolved personal issues which means he was confused and needed help in his life.
It is true that if even one person goes to Hell then I will go with them, because I would defy any person or any God that would do such a thing as Hell. But in my own religious beliefs I know that there is no Hell after death and everybody gets saved in the end. Way to avoid the issue, which was your comment that parents do not leave by their own free will.
The saying that he was drinking and partying and womanizing means the Man had big unresolved personal issues which means he was confused and needed help in his life.
Parents like that need help and not to be hunted down and attacked by Child Support thieves which surely made things far worse then they already were. Where did I say my father was attacked by the CS system? He indeed was NOT.
See, instead of teaching the children to love and to honor their father, the children were taught to want their father to burn in a Hell, so the system we have now destroys the family unit and it alienates the parents and it produces unwholesome adult children. WTF are you talking about? Did I say I do not love my father?
It is common knowledge and not some thing out of a survey.
It is common knowledge and not some thing out of a survey.
I thought you couldn't be a criminal in order to run for office? I must be wrong because Congress is full of them.You'll only be listed as J.P. if you legally change your name. James P. Sr is your legal name, so that is what election laws requires. No nicknames or titles.
Most other people on the Forum know my accomplishments but I will be happy to give a little detail again as the events are very meaningful to me.Graffiti,.....YOU'VE GOT TO BE KIDDING!!!!
OMG... What did you spray paint???
I am 53 now, and I do not do any narcotics.Silly little man. Are you a CRACKPOT? or have you been smoking the same?
How old are you?
I did do Newspaper letters and did get them published, and I sent letters to every Representative in the US Congress and Senate and to the President Clinton and many other letters against the thieving Child Support and I got online Internet tactics and contacts too.You mean you couldn't find a more intelligent way to get your point across?
Like maybe a news paper article.....?
I do not see any of my resistance to the Child Support thievery as a "failure", but I have had many other failures in my years.So you actions were a premeditated scheme.....that failed, .......Hmmm,... much like your election (or lack there of) campain.
My son is not really like me in this regard, and I hope he will some day see the light.It seems that maybe you need to put on your big boy panties and rethink your approach (and the fact that you are a deadbeat dad, and you breeding resulted in a dead beat dad.....a real chip off the old block.)
My own father was a Federal Guard in the downtown Washington area and he would commute back and forth to our home in Hollywood SMC, and he died of cancer when I was just over 17 years old.Tell me, what was your dad like???
Most other people on the Forum know my accomplishments but I will be happy to give a little detail again as the events are very meaningful to me.
It was 1996 or 97 (does not matter which) and I was forced onto the streets homeless by the Child Support enforcement and they ordered me to pay the C/S first instead of me paying rent or getting out of the weather,
We do know about the Courts and the laws and about Child Support and Custody demands, so it is not based on some individual personalities but on the over all picture.So you knew my dad? A little pretentious of you to decide what the actions of a dead man you never met mean, don't you think? When did you earn your Psychology doctorate by the way?
My own words can be taken as literally and as my own perception of truth as I see it to be, and if your words are not "literal" then they are not worth very much.I love how you avoid questions and issues by redirecting. I also like how you worm little insults and misdirections into people's comments. You do realize that statements such as "I'll see you in hell" are figures of speech and not meant to be taken literally... and for you to imply that I somehow want to see my own father 'burn in hell' simply shows your absolute lack of concern for your fellow man and willingness to use them for your own ends. Spoken like a true politician!
You did not mention the Child Support but I know that it is always there hidden in every background and that is why I brought it out.Now, back to the issue... My post appears to have confused you. I did not state that my father never paid child support... I said he walked out on his family of his own free will, which you stated does not happen. How can it not happen absent of force or coercion, if it indeed DID happen, and happens every day, to thousands of kids and families around the world?
You and others here are trying to claim that I have some personal vendetta against Child Support as breaking up my family and my marriage but I have never ever said such a fool thing.YOU want to believe that somehow, the child support system was responsible for forcing you away from your family, fine! But fact is, child support is not involved if you are living with them. You have to LEAVE before they will even get involved. Child support only plays a part in distancing the NCP from the kids and CP when the NCP becomes embittered at the fact they have been court ordered to pay CS, or when the CP becomes embittered that the NCP is not meeting their court ordered responsibility.
The problem that I see is that you give the credit to the thieving Child Support instead of to your Dad.Now for a dose of reality... I love your 'needs are met to overflowing' comments, but such makes it obvious that you live in a fantasy world. I LIVED as a child in the child support system. Yes, my father paid, after he reappeared married to another woman two years after he walked out. And he willingly paid $250 a month back in the 70's. My mom worked as a bank teller for little more than minimum wage, and REFUSED to go on public assistance, because she didn't want her kids to grow dependent or accustomed to hand-outs. Wise women, and my pride in her is unending. Things were very tough for us but she made due. My sister and I always had clothes, shoes, food, a roof... Meager, but there. That child support my father paid enabled us to have a two BR apartment instead of a small one bedroom. It paid for our clothes so we didn't have to wear rags. Little things like that. It did NOT go for my mom... how do I know? Because I was there.
The Child Support was not killing him as it was killing you.My dad on the other hand lived in a nice 3 BR home on the water, beautiful view of Casco Bay. Drove a brand new Mercury Cougar. Had two big TV's, a nice stereo. Ate well, had lots of booze money. Always had cash in his pocket. His new wife always had the best of everything, including a new Volvo. My mom? She drove a beat up old Maverick until she won a raffle and got a new Chevette. Volvo vs. Chevette.... Huh. Seems those CS payments were really killing my dad... NOT.
But you are critical of him, and clearly you are brain washed by that Child Support lies and he knew it.My father wound up very distanced from his kids because in the end getting laid by strange women was more important. The booze? He actually quit drinking when I was in high school. When I was in Germany in the Army he divorced his second wife. When I went home on leave I drove up to visit, and he spent all of about 5 minutes with me then had 'something he had to do'. Nice. Three years later my sister got married... in MN, where I was living. My dad flew out. I drove to his hotel after arranging to spend the day with him. He had 5 minutes for me, then off to play golf... Nice. He passed in '96. Was engaged to yet another woman, much younger than himself. Nobody in his family knew her, or even knew she existed. During his eulogy his sister said "Joseph always had beautiful women in his life, lots of them."
You blame him instead of the ignorant Child Support and Custody laws and it was the law that violated your family unit by attacking your father.Do I love my dad? Sure. He's my dad. You are a pretentious pompous ass to assume otherwise. Do I hate some aspects of my dad's life and behavior? You bet your bippy. Do I resent how he treated me and his family (families?)? Yes.
Yes it was the Child Support that did him wrong and thereby did you wrong, but that was after the separation.Child support had nothing to do with his treating his family and kids like crap. We simply were not a priority in his life. He was having affairs with other women when he was still married to my mom.
I do not want to see that, as I want to repair it so as to make it stop.So go ahead, try to find a way to blame my mom the CP, or the CS system, and rant about your 'honor the parents' crap all you want. It has no bearing on my situation or that of most others, because I and many others do honor their NCP despite what they did to their kids and families. You just don't want to see it because you need justification for your own failings.
If I had the time, I would go back and pull up a few of the instances where he has accused people of "speaking for" others, like himself or some other deadbeat. It's another of his ways to avoid the issue and continue on his boneheaded way spouting his boneheaded beliefs.So you knew my dad? A little pretentious of you to decide what the actions of a dead man you never met mean, don't you think?
If I had the time, I would go back and pull up a few of the instances where he has accused people of "speaking for" others, like himself or some other deadbeat. It's another of his ways to avoid the issue and continue on his boneheaded way spouting his boneheaded beliefs.
But when he wants to speak for others then it's acceptable, of course, because he is omniscient and knows everyone's situation.
I do tell about my injuries on my website, but I will try to make it clear here.So JP, you get to collect disability because you were injured in a prison fight, one that you no doubt started. For some reason this just does not seem right.