Good point. Me thinks someone isAzzy said:If his kids live with you, wtf is he paying CS to her forShouldnt SHE be paying it to him?
Azzy said:If his kids live with you, wtf is he paying CS to her forShouldnt SHE be paying it to him?
Or he got raped by the system and his ex is a money hungry heartless wench :shrug:sockgirl77 said:Good point. Me thinks someone is![]()
:getaroom:Chasey_Lane said:yourself.
![]()
Chasey_Lane said:My point is that not everyone gets "raped" by the system. Not all woman are cruel, heartless, money-hungry wenches.
Seems to me that CS should be null and void in that situation. Or, he should pay it while they're at her house, and she can just pay him back when they come back to your houseCowgirl said:Because we have the kids 50% of the time.
Then CS should be cancelled out if it is truly 50% of the time. :shrug:Cowgirl said:Because we have the kids 50% of the time.
Azzy said:If his kids live with you, wtf is he paying CS to her forShouldnt SHE be paying it to him?
Technically, even if the parents have split custody, the parent who earns more could be ordered to pay the other parent CS.sockgirl77 said:Then CS should be cancelled out if it is truly 50% of the time. :shrug:
somebody sounds bittersockgirl77 said:He created 2 kids. That's life. :shrug:
Chasey_Lane said:Technically, even if the parents have split custody, the parent who earns more could be ordered to pay the other parent CS.
Chasey_Lane said:My point is that not everyone gets "raped" by the system. Not all woman are cruel, heartless, money-hungry wenches.
If its something like 6 months here 6 months there, its unfair to ask either person to pay child support. Or like I said, one pays the other while its their turn, then switches. Seems like alot of hassle though.Wickedwrench said:Maybe a shared custody?:shrug: Even with shared custody someone's going to pay.
Which could easily explain why dougster is ordered to pay the $1400/month. If his income were $6000 6 months ago and it is only $2000K now, he has shown the ability to earn more. If CS was filed before his loss of employment, they could be going on that.cattitude said:You do know that there is such a thing as "voluntary impoverishment" and the judge/master will look at why you aren't working or why you aren't making the same amount of money. While the forumula for determining child support stays constant, the amount of income they use can change, but if the judge/master determines you can make more money, and if the reason you aren't is through a fault of your own, you may not get much sympathy from the court.
He should fry for not paying his CS when it was due.julz20684 said:As we all know it is the responsibility of both parents to care/provide for their children. The system sucks and it never is a win-win situation.
At the cost of what Doug is paying, his children must be very young and in daycare full time, that's the only thing that makes sense for this outrageous amount.
I have full custody of my frick & frack. Father was originally ordered to pay $1100/month back in 1998 when he had a very decent job and I was working a mediocre job. He quit his very decent job and dodged the system on and off for years racking up what is now $25,000 in arrears. All that time I and only I supported those children ~ at times working three jobs and advancing my knowledge to get the type of position I am in now. But still we are living paycheck to paycheck. I own no home, I have very little savings, and college fund, heh, what college fund.
The father walked away from his kids three years ago and hasn't had contact since. Finally apprehended after two and a half years working with the courts and BOSE and served 9 months in jail. Now he is finally working, at no where near what he was making at that very decent job in 1997, he is still ordered to pay the $1100/mth. Do I think that is fair to him, no I do not...but he is too stupid to file for the modification. Nonetheless he will always be responsible for the arrears, which continues to build weekly. I'm just thankful for whatever I get when I can get it. See bottom line is, there is only one person I can count on to take care of my kids, financially, emotionally, and every other "ally" you can say....and that is ME!
As stated, there are so many different sides to the story.
Chasey_Lane said:Which could easily explain why dougster is ordered to pay the $1400/month. If his income were $6000 6 months ago and it is only $2000K now, he has shown the ability to earn more. If CS was filed before his loss of employment, they could be going on that.
sockgirl77 said:Good point. Me thinks someone is![]()