sunmoonstars
New Member
People file suit all the time. A filling doesn't mean there's any substance to it.
People file suit all the time. A filling doesn't mean there's any substance to it.
No substance to a Constitutional question of qualification? That is the gist of the suits, is it not?People file suit all the time. A filling doesn't mean there's any substance to it.
You do know that there are several people in this country who will swear to you that they have been abducted by aliens; oh and don't forget Bigfoot... and isn't their some type of sea monster named Champ, who lives in Lake Champlain too...........
... and bending over in front of a Mexican is not usually what folks are referring to when they talk about the alien probes so you'll have to come up with another story.
This is really interesting - it's a long read - but it lists all the points discussed in this thread:
American Thinker: Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate
Only serious thinkers really need to reply. Anyone else is just stirring the pot & can go pound sand.
People file suit all the time. A filling doesn't mean there's any substance to it.
People file suit all the time. A filling doesn't mean there's any substance to it.
...Tony, doesn't it seem reasonable for him to just come clean on this thing and be done with it? Hell, he can make people who think something is wrong look like paranoid dumb asses AND increase his credibility in one fell swoop.
Where is the good reason to not just settle this?
There is no reason to question THE ONE. How dare we! This is how it's going to be for at least the next 4 years. BO does not have to answer to us. Deal with it.
http://lawreview.kentlaw.edu/articles/81-1/Herlihy.pdf
I'm aware this is almost three years old. But this may be a blueprint of exactly how Obama's lawyers intend to circumvent the Article II requirement for our nation's President to be "natural born".
"Although some of the reasons for maintaining the natural born citizen requirement are rational, many of the reasons are based primarily on emotion. Therefore, although globalization is one impetus that should drive Americans to rely on reason and amend the Constitution, this paper argues that common perceptions about globalization ironically will convince Americans to rely on emotion and oppose a Constitutional amendment."
Sarah P. Herlihy is employed by Kirkland & Ellis LLP Kirkland & Ellis LLP > Home
Note: this law firm is based in Chicago. Bruce I. Ettelson, P.C., is a Member of the finance committees for both U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin.
It now appears that the One World Order proponents behind Barack H. Obama have been working on this issue for a few years. They intend to thoroughly trash our Constitution and destroy the United States of America.
For a complete look at the document go to the above listed source URL. This is truly frightening.
1 posted on Friday, November 28, 2008 5:40:29 PM by SatinDoll
OH, and I'm going to start a NEW thread with that last post of mine. Just because I can.
Interesting that a newspaper based in Kenya is covering this and that the writer has such a skewed outlook on the origins of the electoral college.