More on that Birth Certificate thing...

SouthernMdRocks

R.I.P. Bobo, We miss you!
Where/when was it produced and examained by someone not working for him?


It was examined by others and they concluded it was fake. I just don't understand why he doesn't produce the original and make this all go away if he has nothing to hide. That bc that was produced is far from a valid document. One can be registered with that type of certificate after their birth by the parent with US citizenship if they have a child born abroad and on US territory or BOTH parents US citizens.
 

SouthernMdRocks

R.I.P. Bobo, We miss you!
Again, when he got his passport. It would've been examined by employee(s) of the US State Dept. I'm quite certain they don't work for him.

They claim he traveled at age 21 under an Indonesian Passport. If he didn't and he used his US PPort, would it not be on record and stamped for that travel??
 

chernmax

NOT Politically Correct!!
Again, when he got his passport. It would've been examined by employee(s) of the US State Dept. I'm quite certain they don't work for him.

Obama's sister has a US passport and she was born in Indonesia, we don't know what his birth certificate says as far as place of Birth, his mother could have registered his birth here and gotten duel citizenship even though the US will only recognize his US citizenship. He could have shown a naturalized US Birth certificate for his passport and would have been issued a US Passport. To my knowledge, just like the DMV, the state department reviews your original documents then mails it back to you, they don't maintain the copies!!!
 

Kerad

New Member
Seriously, did you not see the Annenberg Foundation name at the top of the page?

Doesn't it seem just a little weird that the ONLY people to examine the document have long term political and monetary ties to Obama?

And the Hawaiian Department of Health.

Seriously.
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
One of your options had Bush staying on until March 4th. That can't happen since his term ends at noon on the 20th of Jan. Even if Biden were still picked for VP and the incoming POTUS spot is empty, that would mean that Biden would assume the POTUS spot. Then, once sworn in as POTUS, Biden would appoint a VP under the 25th ammendment.
But, by the amendment's words, If there is no answer on the president from the House of Representatives before this, the VP does not assume the duties of president until March 4th. Who's president between Jan 20 and Mar 4?
 

The Oyster Guy

New Member
What a bunch of babbling, frothing, consiracy theorists you've all become... You guys are as pathetic as the moonbats on the left - you'll invent reasons to discount reality and embrace the fantastical if it supports your prejudiced conclusions.

Q. Is the State of Hawaii part of your great conspiracy, too?

A. SoMDConspiracyNut: "Well yeah. Obviously Hawaii is part of the conspiracy, because they're testifying that Obama was born in Honolulu, when everybody *knows* that he was actually born in Kenya. I know because I read it on a blog on the internet"

Here's your tin-foil hat... Congratulations, you've earned it. :killingme
 

This_person

Well-Known Member
I've been on a jury. The witnesses and "documentation" have to be credible. Not just some bullsh!t talked about on the Intenet.

Again, if there was ever any substance to these charges, it would have been settled months ago.
That's counterintuitive.

The documentation is credible. The witnesses are blood relatives who are testifying against the interests of the accused and have no demonstrated malice to back them - making them pretty damned credible.

And, if there were NO substance, I could see why you'd say it would have gone away. The fact that it's still out there, and that at least four supreme court justices saw fit to agree that Obama needs to settle the issue instead of voting "present" on it make it pretty substantive. It may very well be false, that's for sure. But, it's credible and substantive.
 

Kerad

New Member
What a bunch of babbling, frothing, consiracy theorists you've all become... You guys are as pathetic as the moonbats on the left - you'll invent reasons to discount reality and embrace the fantastical if it supports your prejudiced conclusions.

Q. Is the State of Hawaii part of your great conspiracy, too?

A. SoMDConspiracyNut: "Well yeah. Obviously Hawaii is part of the conspiracy, because they're testifying that Obama was born in Honolulu, when everybody *knows* that he was actually born in Kenya. I know because I read it on a blog on the internet"

Here's your tin-foil hat... Congratulations, you've earned it. :killingme

:lol:

No kidding.
 

aps45819

24/7 Single Dad
What a bunch of babbling, frothing, consiracy theorists you've all become... You guys are as pathetic as the moonbats on the left - you'll invent reasons to discount reality and embrace the fantastical if it supports your prejudiced conclusions.

Q. Is the State of Hawaii part of your great conspiracy, too?

A. SoMDConspiracyNut: "Well yeah. Obviously Hawaii is part of the conspiracy, because they're testifying that Obama was born in Honolulu, when everybody *knows* that he was actually born in Kenya. I know because I read it on a blog on the internet"

Here's your tin-foil hat... Congratulations, you've earned it. :killingme

... and yet he refuses to produce it in court for examination. :shrug:
 

Lenny

Lovin' being Texican
In my case, I only had to show my passport for column A of the I-9 form. Didn't have to worry about columns B or C because the passport covers pretty much everything else including the birth certificate. The passport shows date and place of birth.


Your passport was contingent on producing a birth certificate in the first place, right?
 
Top