Tilted
..
To the extent some short sellers are getting burned, I don't have a lot of sympathy for them. They should know the risks going in. Short selling plays a useful role in equity markets, but it can also be abused and cause - sometimes unjustified - damage to companies.I've been following this story and I've been on reddit for the last two days following this, and it very much appears at this point that it's not about money, it's about sending a message, particularly to Melvin Capital, who is currently taking the brunt of the current ass-pounding. And I can't say that I'm sorry for them. It looks like they've destroyed a lot of people, and they've been shielded by corporatist machinations up to this point. Now their losing at their own game. **** 'em.
If I had the first clue about daytrading and how the stock market worked, I'd throw a thousand bucks or so that way. I would never advise anyone to risk more money than they can actually afford to lose. It's all always a gamble. But, I'd love to see the little guy use the free market to butt**** a corporate player who desperately deserves it.
With that said - Who wants to take bets that congress passes some shady-ass legislation to protect their corporate masters.
... BEFORE you get your stimulus checks.
I bet that something gets set in motion today.
I can only hope that if that happens people FINALLY wake up to the reality of where they stand in the eyes of congress. The peasantry does not matter to these ****ing people.
That said, I'm not sure why GameStop short sellers would be targeted like this. I've never followed GameStop. I looked at it for the first time this morning in response to a query about what's been going on with it. There was good reason why people might have been short selling it. And this wasn't the kind of crush-a-company-short-selling that sometimes happens. If anything, short sellers were probably helping the company itself. It wasn't trying to raise additional capital through public equity offerings. To the contrary, it was repurchasing shares - so it likely was benefitting from short sellers betting against its share price. (To reiterate, I've not been following GameStop for long and wouldn't consider myself particularly well informed on its business operations and situation as I would with some other companies. So maybe there are things I'm not aware of from my initial look at it.)
Maybe GameStop short sellers have been targeted for other short selling they've done, and their GameStop positions were seen as an easier way to do damage to them? I don't know. Also, as I suggested, maybe this started as sincere push back against some things. But at this point it's gone beyond that into precarious territory for many of the very retail investors involved. And I wouldn't rule out that this was contrived from the beginning by some seeing an opportunity to use a populist message to martial help in a modern method pump and dump. The rhetoric would look much the same. The point would be to make it look like this was justified populist push back.
I'd add that, while short sellers may have taken a beaten in this, some hedge funds - which, generally speaking, seem to be at least symbolic targets for this push back - are surely benefitting. Most of GameStop was, of course, institutionally owned. And now hedge funds are almost certainly taking advantage of this opportunity to reduce or close out their positions at valuations which are much higher than they thought they'd be able to exit at. They're going to do very well with this situation. Some retailer investors will (or have) also. But many retail investors are going to have been taken advantage of and will lose a lot of money. It's going to require some luck to get out - or stop the rotation, depending on how some are trading this - at just the right moment.