After 3 years of service you can deduct $3500. For the most part, this is money the state gives up. If a county went career, it's not like they would get that money. Either way, small potatoes compared with the salary of a career firefighter.
So, the state would have more money, based on not giving up $3500/volunteer, but there's not a reason to believe the county (with a new cost for the county and more income to the state) would not recoup some of that? That seems unlikely to be true.
By the way, how many volunteers get that $3500? How many professionals would be necessary? I'm thinking that if there were even 10/1 ratio of volunteers that get the tax break to paid members, that would go an awfully long way to paying much of their salary. And, given that the volunteers must be grossly over-numbered compared to how many paid members would be necessary, that doesn't seem like much of a stretch to the imagination.
You do understand that most of the training at the station-house level is provided by other volunteers.
Yes. I do understand that. Are you suggesting there is no cost?
The courses through MFRI are paid for by the state out of the surcharge on motor vehicle registrations. The students can deduct their unreimbursed travel expenses from their taxable income, no different from someone volunteering for their church or a boyscout council. The county pays little to nothing for that training.
And, what does that cost? Times how many volunteers as compared to the training that would be provided by those paid to be, in your words, doing nothing 90% of the time. Not really much of a change there, so the off-site training is where there would be a difference. Well, that, and the number of people needing trained. I wonder if it costs more to train 143 people or, let's say, 50 people (using BDVFD as an example).
A couple of printed banners put next to the public right of way, some ads in local papers that are often provided at a discounted rate. You really think this amounts to much?
More than zero? Yes. Hundreds of millions? No.
If St Marys provided career service with the same cost structure as Anne Arundel, it would cost 20mil instead of the current 2.7mil. 16mil to address your feelings sounds rather expensive.
There are many issues with your statement. Where does the $20M come from? Where does the $2.7M come from? Are we comparing apples and apples, or does one assume only some costs while the other assumes other costs? Much of the conversation involved here generally is exactly what you're describing - the $3500/year is not a cost to the county, but it is a cost to the taxpayer writ large. It is very likely that the county would benefit financially towards the pay of professional services that is not considered into this analysis, for example.
There is very little turnover in volunteer companies. Yes, people come and go at the junior levels, but once people have 3-5 years in, the crew remains quite stable. Smaller agencies that have gone career have found a high turnover because once people have a year of employment as professional on their CV, they go and test for city and suburban departments that are unionized and pay well.
So, we would have to be competitive?
In this case you dont. In fire protection, you pay people a good salary to do nothing 90% of the time. This is not like police that moves from call to call and does traffic enforcement in between.
That's insurance, right? I mean, that's not a difference from your car insurance or anything else.
I absolutely think it would cost more for professional services. If I am coming across to you that I think it would not cost more, then I am trying now to ensure you realize what I am thinking.