Nanny Pam
************
I am not a lawyer, but I try to watch Judge Judy ever day, so based on that expertise, I can tell you that if there is no witness or physical evidence that you are indeed the one that took the money, then mere speculation and assumption is not enough to convict you. But if you keep talking and in your confusion, you change your wording each time they can use that to say you keep changing your story and can use that as circumstancial evidence against you. Stop talking and go see a lawyer.
Do you get the feeling that you're talking to the wall?
Could this be a nitwit MPD?