Originally posted by Bruzilla
When I write of "talking about your sex life" I am referring to discussing your sexual preferences, which are nobody's business unless you choose to make them so.
I'm not so sure you do get the double standard, Bruzilla.
Suppose we're co-workers meeting for the first time. We stand in the coffee room indulging in a little chit-chat--where do you live, how long have you worked here, and, since we've eyed each other's rings, I ask what your better half does, and you ask me the same. You'd answer (if you're male) "she's an ...." And I tell you what
my better half does--using the same pronoun.
I've just mentioned my orientation to you. Am I now talking about my sexual "preferences?" Have I revealed "my sex life?" Remember, I have exactly the same data about you. I know you're married to a member of the opposite sex. Honey, that tells me nothing about your sex life, something I'd never want to know about anyway.
Except in threads where the topic is explicitly political and somehow related to gay Americans, such as this one, or in threads like the one Vraiblonde started to ask me about my politics, I've done nothing more than mention something similar to that above. I've talked about Kathy a little, and in one thread I made a joke about not knowing how to wash men's underwear.
With posts like that, I'm talking about my sex life?
Originally posted by Bruzilla
I've read numerous posts from Bertha reguarding her being a Lesbian. That's a fine thing, but she's the one that felt a need to mention the fact that she's a Lesbian, and I think that's a mistake unless you're willing to endure the slings and arrows of criticism that's going to come at you.
See, this is one of the things I don't get: why would anyone criticise anyone because of an immutable trait?
Originally posted by Bruzilla
For the third time... I think you should keep your sex life to yourself. If you want to talk about your heterosexual husband or homosexual partner, knock yourself out, but you're opening yourself to criticism if you do and if you can't take the criticism don't go inviting it.
I certainly expect to defend myself. I'm used to that. For fifteen years I've been defending myself against accusations I shouldn't
have to defend myself against. But discussing an immutable trait entitles one to
criticise another for it.... that's strange.
Originally posted by Bruzilla
The fact that your sexuality is being discussed on this forum means that you have offered it up as a point of discussion somewhere along the line. There's nothing wrong with that, and it's your freedom to discuss it... just don't get mad when someone insults you because of it.
Then, Bruzilla, you oughtn't get mad if I insult you because of
your orientation.
You say you see the double standard but you think it's right.... because my orientation is outside the norm? Well, of course it's outside the norm. No one knows for sure but between 90-98% of human beings are heterosexual. That doesn't make us w/ homosexual orientation wrong or
abnormal or twisted or perverted. It just happens that some people are gay; lots of people have been looking into it lately, but so far no one knows why. More people are probably
left-handed than are gay; are southpaws abnormal? They didn't choose to be left-handed any more than you chose to be heterosexual.
You say you see the double standard, and you think it's right. I just don't understand that.
We may as well agree to disagree. What do you think? Otherwise, we'll each just have to keep beating what the other thinks is a dead horse, and that's not even interesting to lurkers. It's just annoying.