punjabigyrl
Active Member
Like the Shia's we hitched our wagon to in Iraq?
I was not there with you so I will take your word for it.
Like the Shia's we hitched our wagon to in Iraq?
I was not there with you so I will take your word for it.
This article talks about Taqqiya but it does NOT stress that this is a concept only followed by the Shia sect ONLY. She has lumped the concept to every muslims on earth.
You try make it sound like the Shia are a tiny minority of Muslims.![]()
I didn't take her statement that way but never the less, according to a BBC article dated December 2013, Shia are only 10% of the Muslim population. Other sources cite anywhere from 7.5% to 30%. Either way, to lump them all together would be like saying Catholics believe you have to be born again or Protestants honor the Virgin Mary, which would be false.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-25434060
Many progressive leaders in the West do not understand the threat posed by Islam because they cannot get their collective heads around the idea that religion is still a force in the world. Unlike secular progressives, ISIS troops do believe in a god and are willing to die for that god.
Franco
Your post is extremely informative and interesting. However, I think the reasons for this phenomenon are mundane. Leftists hate and fear their immediate threat, American conservatives, devout Christians and Republicans. In the enemy of my enemy is my friend thinking, Republicans *hate* Muslims, Islamists hate Jews (many lefties secretly hate Jews too especially right wing Israeli types) and Christians so there is an alliance right there.
Radical Muslims are victims and right-wing Americans who made them that way. Sure they don’t like the radical Muslims but it’s not their fault (more condescending racism) it was colonials and Bush who made them hate us.
Furthermore all muslims aren’t bad. The ones I know (narcissistic solipsism) are nice and they are discriminated against and misunderstood by ignorant right-wing bigots.
So you see, it is at once complicated and simple. The simple-minded leftist thinks the issue is complicated and they think others are being simplistic and ignorant.
Felling superior and nuanced is very enjoyable for them.
I read several sources that put the Shia at nearly 40% of the middle eastern population (% of total population) and around 15% of the world Muslim population. And taken in the context of her previous posts, it was quite obvious she wanted the marginalize the mere existence of Shia Muslims...and dismiss them out of hand. That's the standard spin. It does not work.
That would still leave 60% of the population that DOES NOT practice or believe in taqqiya; therefore, the article is incorrect by lumping all Muslims with the act. That's not to say that taqqiya isn't an issue when it comes to Middle East matters, but punjabigyrl was correct to make the observation.
But, again, it is critical to OUR national interests and problems because we backed the Shia's in Iraq (Chalabi et al) and it could go a ways towards understanding why they didn't much do what we wanted and expected; they never were because they simply used us. I'm not saying they were wrong to; we do it to people's all the time. I'm pointing it out to to illustrate that part of the reason it seems like we didn't know what we were getting into is because...we didn't.
I think you and Gilligan are missing the very simple point. Punjabigyrl was not making a statement about Middle East issues, rather she was making an observation that the article is misleading in one aspect and why. Her point is not that hard to understand...unless you don't want to.
Authorities have not said how they think the girls became interested in helping the Islamic State militants. In Conley's case, she told agents she wanted to marry a suitor she met online who said he was a Tunisian man fighting with the Islamic State group in Syria.
I think you and Gilligan are missing the very simple point..
None of that changes the fact that the article was misleading about taqqiya and who practices it.
Carry on...
None of that changes the fact that the article was misleading about taqqiya and who practices it.
Carry on...
The only article posted in defense of your line of thought was also misleading. The statement in the article "Accurate figures for the breakdown of the Muslim population into the various strands are not available as almost no censuses or surveys ask Muslims about which they are" pretty much nullifies the figures.
I'm curious, what exactly do you think my "line of thought" is?