GWguy
*
I could tell stories.........
And you have....
I could tell stories.........
If the father doesn't live locally to help out, who do you think stays home from work with the sick kids and transports them to/from doctors appointments, etc.?
Let's just make a situation where the ex-wife/custodial parent gets the child for 10 months of the year, and gets child support for that child. During that time, she gets absolutely no break from the child, nor the resposibility that that means. Every single dentist appointment - the mom is the one taking the kid to the dentist. Every single doctor apoint - the mom is the one taking the kid to the doctor. Every single parent-teacher conference - the mom is the one there. Every single sport's practice and game - the mom is the one there. Every single County fair day and every other day off from school - the mom is the one scrambling to find alternate care for the child. Every dinner that that kid eats is because of that mother.OK... but what about the other side of the coin?
I guess the working non-custodial parent is just screwed for daycare and or other means of taking care of the children while he/she is working.
I just think it should be fair all around. If it's good enough for the goose....
Does everyone NOT see that these same circumstances can and will be had during the non-custodial parent's visit?
Im not saying that there is not an obligation by the non-custodial parent when the custodial parent has them. What I AM saying is "Why do these obligations get forgotten about when the non-custodial parent has the children?"
Why is it inconceivable that the CP should pay support when the NCP has the children for an extended period of time?
Can't she take two months of the year off from that tremendous responsibility and take a break from that load?
Does everyone NOT see that these same circumstances can and will be had during the non-custodial parent's visit?
Im not saying that there is not an obligation by the non-custodial parent when the custodial parent has them. What I AM saying is "Why do these obligations get forgotten about when the non-custodial parent has the children?"
Why is it inconceivable that the CP should pay support when the NCP has the children for an extended period of time?
I guess the working non-custodial parent is just screwed for daycare and or other means of taking care of the children while he/she is working.
Does everyone NOT see that these same circumstances can and will be had during the non-custodial parent's visit?
Im not saying that there is not an obligation by the non-custodial parent when the custodial parent has them. What I AM saying is "Why do these obligations get forgotten about when the non-custodial parent has the children?"
Why is it inconceivable that the CP should pay support when the NCP has the children for an extended period of time?
Let's just make a situation where the ex-wife/custodial parent gets the child for 10 months of the year, and gets child support for that child. During that time, she gets absolutely no break from the child, nor the resposibility that that means. Every single dentist appointment - the mom is the one taking the kid to the dentist. Every single doctor apoint - the mom is the one taking the kid to the doctor. Every single parent-teacher conference - the mom is the one there. Every single sport's practice and game - the mom is the one there. Every single County fair day and every other day off from school - the mom is the one scrambling to find alternate care for the child. Every dinner that that kid eats is because of that mother.
You see, the mom is EVERYTHING to that child in those 10 months that he/she is with the mom. She gets no breaks, or certainly, minimal breaks from the responsibility of caring for that child.
Can't she take two months of the year off from that tremendous responsibility and take a break from that load?
NOTE: I use the example of the mother being the primary care-giver, but there are fine examples on this forum where the fathers are the primary care-giver to their kids. These fathers do awesome job of caring for their kids, and shouldn't be overlooked for all that they do.
You see, the mom is EVERYTHING to that child in those 10 months that he/she is with the mom. She gets no breaks, or certainly, minimal breaks from the responsibility of caring for that child.
I think you'll make for an awesome, caring compassionate ex someday..
I think you'll make for an awesome, caring compassionate ex someday..
Who will get custody of the chickens...Ut oh...
Who will get custody of the chickens...
First, let me reiterate: I let him slide on CS for the month that the kids were with him. What he wanted was for *me* to pay *him*.
In my case the ex would had a wife that could stay home with them while he was working because she didn't work.
During that month, the rent didn't go away. Like BG said, the daycare bill didn't go away. I'm not the one who made him move across the country so that he couldn't have weekends or whenever he wanted visitation and had to do month at a shot. His lifestyle was one of him and his wife, and his bills reflected that. My bills and lifestyle were geared toward me and two kids, with the 3 BR home that I wouldn't have needed if not for them.
He never kicked in extra for school clothes, sports, summer camp or any of that. Ready? When our son was playing football I asked him if he'd take him shopping for cleats and get them broken in before practices started. He took that money out of my next month's child support.
And that was fine, but I certainly wasn't going to pay him CS for the month he had the kids. I thought I was being generous by not making him pay for that month.
I may bow out of this as I do not want it to go hostile.
I was merely trying to state that, although there are no provisions for an NCP to receive compensation from the CP when they have the children for an extended period of time, there is NO argument that can be made to justify why this is.
At least one that could NOT equally apply to the NCP.
When I saw how well he took care of his ex-wife, when he wasn't required to do so, I thought to myself, "you know, he's gonna make an excellent ex-husband".Oh hell no. She'll be taking your ass to the cleaners, her girlfriends will see to that.