I may bow out of this as I do not want it to go hostile.
I was merely trying to state that, although there are no provisions for an NCP to receive compensation from the CP when they have the children for an extended period of time, there is NO argument that can be made to justify why this is.
At least one that could NOT equally apply to the NCP.
The way it worked for us in FL at the time we got divorced:
He made a certain amount of money. I made a certain amount of money. TOGETHER - our income was $xxxxxx.xx So the court decided that HE made 58% of that total and I made 42% of that. The court then deducted for a certain number of things from each parent (the amount one pd the health insurance, for example or the amount the other parent pd for dental care, etc.) THAT total was the one we based the child support on. So, for instance: (not real figures, just an example)
Let's say the Court determined for our family, the standard of EACH child's living for a month should be $1100. Father paid 58% of that total ($638.00) and I paid 42% of that total. ($462.00) This was fair because HE made more money than I did. (Still does.) He paid me, because I was the Primary custodial parent. Anyway, the object was not to make money off of him, but to keep the children's standard of living the same - which it did. He looks at it like I was screwing him, but I wasn't. MY income was raised up in order to support the kids (3 people) and his was equal to mine (after it was raised up) how is that unfair?
As for the visitation, we had a liberal one, because he agreed (in the marital agreement) AND the court ruled that I could move with the kids up to Maryland so I could work for a friend's company. I lived in this area for 20 years before marrying and moving. He could have moved up here & gotten a job with a contractor, but chose not to. He saw them either Easter or Christmas and took them for a part of the summer for a couple of years. He quit seeing the kids very much after a couple of years - basically, when I stopped offering to pay half their way, to make it easier on him. Mind you, he was the one bringing in a full time income + military retirement pay + a VA pension (tax free pay). I was entitled to, but didn't take - half of his military retirement pay, because I was not trying to screw him for everything. He also had a government job with quite a bit of sick leave & annual leave - something I did NOT have. (I had a job with a small company where I worked 6 hrs a day for full time pay, but only 7 days of paid leave a year + holidays.)
At the time of the divorce I also gave him too much credit and didn't go through the state to have the CS sent to me. Over the years, he has played several child support games. The most interesting one was forcing me to take him to court to force him to pay adult disabled child support for our 22yo disabled son. I guess he figured that Thing1 ceased to eat or require any support once he turned 21. (for the record, he interpreted the divorce decree as stating CS ends at 21 but forgot to read the subsequent paragraph which stated we would be responsible for Thing1 50/50 after he turned 21)
It's much more involved than that, and my close friends know what a jerk & a-hole he is. But yeah - I basically raise them alone, without any family in the area and they haven't gone to his house formally in 2 years. And this was on top of my mother actually living in my house with me as HER primary caretaker for 6 months. Scumbag really doesn't begin to describe...