Dye Tied
Garden Variety Gnome
I'm just trying to take a reasoned approach to this. Looks like we've got two camps forming in this thread, as usual - Either "They're just kids!" or "Kill 'em all!" And I'm not going to jump on either bandwagon.
I agree that older teenagers can pose just as much a threat to your safety as somebody who is 18 or older. There are situations where firing a gun would be necessary. And I mentioned as much in my response.
I don't know any of the people involved in this incident, but on the face of it, it appears that the shotgun was overkill in this situation. Maybe I'm wrong - maybe Mr. Arminger had exhausted all his other options. The fact that the teenager was hit on the backside doesn't help his case, though. :shrug:
Edited to add: I also don't mean to imply any sympathy for the kid, either. I think they should have made him pick out the shot himself. Maybe give him a bullet to bite, but that's it.
Maybe he also kept stoking the fires by yelling at the kids and not acting like the older and wiser 'elderly' gentlemen he is supposed to be.
The kids aren't innocent, he's not innocent and they all need to be prosecuted for whatever crimes they all committed.
You just can't go pulling out guns in a neighborhood. He was clearly in the wrong on that.