Do you work at the post office?so by your logic.....
If you hadn't been making these stupid comments in this forum, some maniac you pissed off wouldn't be thinking about hunting you down and killing you.
that makes sense to you right?
Do you work at the post office?so by your logic.....
If you hadn't been making these stupid comments in this forum, some maniac you pissed off wouldn't be thinking about hunting you down and killing you.
that makes sense to you right?
so by your logic.....
If you hadn't been making these stupid comments in this forum, some maniac you pissed off wouldn't be thinking about hunting you down and killing you.
that makes sense to you right?
Do you work at the post office?
Never thought I see the day when skateboarders are like the Blood and Crips. I think I will go watch "Gran Torino"
so by your logic.....
If you hadn't been making these stupid comments in this forum, some maniac you pissed off wouldn't be thinking about hunting you down and killing you.
that makes sense to you right?
If I die today, it's gonna be entirely on your head.
The times, they are a'changing. Kids don't fear getting in trouble anymore, and they're not taught basic respect and courtesy.
So you equate posting on a forum to physical threats and in your face harassment? Really?
I'm sure this would work great!! And I doubt the punks would come back a few nights later with their friends and say 100,000 rounds & just light up on your house...that surely wouldnt happen!!! kids just don't do that sort of stuff...
If I die today, it's gonna be entirely on your head.
Do you work at the post office?
what proof do you have that these kids physically threatened that man?
what proof do you have that they were harassing that man?
seems just as likely to me that arminger was the instigator and a bully because they were skateboarding in "his" (debatable) parking lot.
Your argument has officially jumped the shark.
But I've seen almost nobody opine that the shooting of the young hoodlum was not the wrong thing to do though. In fact, the only truly unrestrained support for the shooter that I've read came from somewhere else on line and not in this forum thread or this forum, period.
Jeez, I already said
Sorry, folks, but I think the kids had it coming and I also believe a person has a right to protect their property, and not have to live in fear of young punks harassing and threatening them. I do not know for a fact, but I suspect that this was a last resort for Mr. Armiger. If he were the type to just go off half-cocked (ha) and start shooting at people, I believe he'd have done it long before this incident. That, to me, is a pure common sense conclusion.
So I agree with Kwillybear:
In an ideal world, punk kids wouldn't harass others. Next ideal would be if cops actually prevented that sort of thing from happening, or at least caught and arrested the offenders. Least ideal is to have to take matters into your own hands, but if #1 and #2 fail, that's all we're left with.
what proof do you have that these kids physically threatened that man?
what proof do you have that they were harassing that man?
seems just as likely to me that arminger was the instigator and a bully because they were skateboarding in "his" (debatable) parking lot.
i understand. it's much easier for you to just speculate and stereotype these kids.
it's not worth discussing when someone actually asks for proof of your accusations.
I would like it on the record that this RPMDAD is not related to The RPM poster on this thread. I think Mr. A went to far with the shooting, but feel he was pushed over the edge in to it, by the youths...