ylexot
Super Genius
No, it said Priest Bridge Center, not Priest Bridge Drive.
Last edited:
No, it said Priest Bridge Center, not Priest Bridge Drive.
T
Toreadoralpha
Guest
GFY, no Go F Yourself! You are the one trying to make excuses for a KILLER. You are the one who can't comprehend a very simple article in a newspaper, which probably means you are too effing stupid to comprehend a roadsign as well.
mAlice "I don't like that anytime a bike gets hit everyone automatically assumes the other driver was at fault."
Nobody automatically assumed anything except you. Your parents must be real proud that the shallow end of the gene pool produced someone that walks upright!
mAlice
professional daydreamer
LateApex
New Member
That is the most idiotic thing I've ever read...
Plus your reading comprehension skills are absolutely non-existent...
T
toppick08
Guest
.....told myself this would be good........
mAlice
professional daydreamer
I wouldn't go that far, but they are a little off today.
Lugnut
I'm Rick James #####!
She did not yield right of way, and did not see an oncoming vehicle. Those two items show she was negligent.
If he had been on 4 wheels and died, would all of you still be saying "Well, he chose to drive on the roads, he has to assume some of the risk"?
How about this, slap her hand, no jail time, no monetary fine, just tatoo her forehead with the phrase "I killed a man because I wasn't paying atention"?
itsbob
I bowl overhand
aps45819
24/7 Single Dad
I'll see about 30 on my 7 mile ride home today, plus the folks that don't know how to use their turn signals
My next mod will be a headlight modulator
Dye Tied
Garden Variety Gnome
Gotta wonder if she heard him.
several times louder pipes made a driver look and see us. Not everyone likes the sound of a riding sewing machine 
She did hit him and said she didn't see him whether he was on drugs, no license or whatever. She had the traffic violation no matter what his condition was.
Sounds like 2 dumbazzes to me. (if he was impaired)
pixiegirl
Cleopatra Jones
You've never, ever had a close call or a fender bender that was your fault? For the record, I haven't but I won't assume that I'm above it either. People make mistakes. I'd rather the jails be filled with real criminals.
She did not see an oncoming vehicle and thus did not yield the right of way. Your words there... Negligent would be seeing the vehicle and "trying to make it". So your assumption there just favored her in that she did not see it. This whole point is mute because neither you nor I was in the car.
Go back and read sugar, I said she SHOULD be punished just not crucified.
LateApex
New Member
I have an intramedullary rod in my right femur because someone wasn't paying attention and didn't yield the right of way.
I was on crutches for 6 months and a cane for 7 months because someone wasn't paying attention.
I see it all the time. People moving over lanes THEN looking to see if anyone is there.
Men and women are guilty of these things.
But, I'd have to say the majority of people doing these things are the soccer moms driving their SUVs...
I was on crutches for 6 months and a cane for 7 months because someone wasn't paying attention.
I see it all the time. People moving over lanes THEN looking to see if anyone is there.
Men and women are guilty of these things.
But, I'd have to say the majority of people doing these things are the soccer moms driving their SUVs...
pixiegirl
Cleopatra Jones
Under the same circumstances I'd say the same thing; it was an unfortunate accident. Unless you live in a bubble anything can become a risk.
LateApex
New Member
You've never, ever had a close call or a fender bender that was your fault? For the record, I haven't but I won't assume that I'm above it either. People make mistakes. I'd rather the jails be filled with real criminals.
She did not see an oncoming vehicle and thus did not yield the right of way. Your words there... Negligent would be seeing the vehicle and "trying to make it". So your assumption there just favored her in that she did not see it. This whole point is mute because neither you nor I was in the car.
Go back and read sugar, I said she SHOULD be punished just not crucified.
I'd say negligent is turning into the path of an oncoming vehicle then stating "I didn't see him."
Lugnut
I'm Rick James #####!
You've never, ever had a close call or a fender bender that was your fault? For the record, I haven't but I won't assume that I'm above it either. People make mistakes. I'd rather the jails be filled with real criminals.
She did not see an oncoming vehicle and thus did not yield the right of way. Your words there... Negligent would be seeing the vehicle and "trying to make it". So your assumption there just favored her in that she did not see it. This whole point is mute because neither you nor I was in the car.
Go back and read sugar, I said she SHOULD be punished just not crucified.
itsbob
I bowl overhand
Impacted the left front fender, ejected from the motorcycle.. than what? What was he wearing that may have prevented his death or even serious injury?
How fast was he going when he impacted the fender? I don't see any picture with the article to suggest how fast he was going.
Motorcyclist was wearing a helmet.. what kind of helmet? Where was it at the accident scene, still on his head? Was it a real helmet at all? Or did he buy the DOT sticker at the dealer to put on his nice shiny novelty helmet?
Lot of questions on both sides would need to be answered before placing blame..
First and foremost, the guy on the bike has to understand how vulnerable he is.. and it doesn't matter who has the right of way.. or who was right or wrong.. regardless who was right, he's dead she's not.
How fast was he going when he impacted the fender? I don't see any picture with the article to suggest how fast he was going.
Motorcyclist was wearing a helmet.. what kind of helmet? Where was it at the accident scene, still on his head? Was it a real helmet at all? Or did he buy the DOT sticker at the dealer to put on his nice shiny novelty helmet?
Lot of questions on both sides would need to be answered before placing blame..
First and foremost, the guy on the bike has to understand how vulnerable he is.. and it doesn't matter who has the right of way.. or who was right or wrong.. regardless who was right, he's dead she's not.
LateApex
New Member
All of the above could be true.
It doesn't change the fact that the woman drove into the path of the motorcyclist...
GWguy
*
Negligent, yes. "GROSSLY" negligent, no.
pixiegirl
Cleopatra Jones
I fractured C-1 and only by the grace of God wasn't paralyzed. It's not like I'm unsympathetic to the victim.
This lady has not been charged therefore there must be extenuating factors. There are a lot of assumptions in this thread.
itsbob
I bowl overhand
She did hit him and said she didn't see him whether he was on drugs, no license or whatever. She had the traffic violation no matter what his condition was.
Sounds like 2 dumbazzes to me. (if he was impaired)
I'm assuming he had loud(er) pipes.. and she never said.. "I didn't hear him" she said "I didn't see him."..
Being obnoxiously loud does not save lives, it just pisses off the neighbors.