Chris Benoit

[vraiblonde]

My anger is at a hypocrite that calls Benoit eveil yet can post on here defending a chil molester. That is where the anger is.

First of all, I never defended a child molester. If you think that, then you should consider taking a remedial reading class.

But you keep spewing what your girlfriend put in your head. It's much easier than thinking for yourself.

 

[PrchJrkr]

Thank you for giving us that update. That clears up a lot of speculation.

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to nachomama again.

Dammit!!! I should've saved my kramer for this one!

 

[Spudtrooper]

First of all, I never defended a child molester. If you think that, then you should consider taking a remedial reading class.

But you keep spewing what your girlfriend put in your head. It's much easier than thinking for yourself.

Originally Posted by vraiblonde
No, but it's not some skeezy pedophile sneaking into a little kid's room at night, either.

And should someone who makes a mistake ONE TIME be branded for life and their whole family have to pay the price? If it were ongoing and true abuse, that would be one thing. But that's not what happened.
I suppose that is taken out of context huh?

 

[jetmonkey]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde
No, but it's not some skeezy pedophile sneaking into a little kid's room at night, either.

And should someone who makes a mistake ONE TIME be branded for life and their whole family have to pay the price? If it were ongoing and true abuse, that would be one thing. But that's not what happened.
I suppose that is taken out of context huh?

Benoit killed three times :shrug:

 

[FromTexas]

Originally Posted by vraiblonde
No, but it's not some skeezy pedophile sneaking into a little kid's room at night, either.

And should someone who makes a mistake ONE TIME be branded for life and their whole family have to pay the price? If it were ongoing and true abuse, that would be one thing. But that's not what happened.
I suppose that is taken out of context huh?

You know how I know you're gay? You can't count because the other nine fingers are shoved up your arse.

 

[Spudtrooper]

Benoit killed three times :shrug:

Jesus that isn't the point, my point is that she would condone it if he only killed one person? Since if you only molest a child ONCE she thinks that is ok.

 

[cattitude]

Benoit killed three times :shrug:

Nobody said Spud was smart.

 

[FromTexas]

Jesus that isn't the point, my point is that she would condone it if he only killed one person? Since if you only molest a child ONCE she thinks that is ok.

You know how I know you're gay? You missed the point and put it straight up your arse.

 

[Lilypad]

You know how I know you're gay? You missed the point and put it straight up your arse.

Okay enough already-this is getting real old

 

[jetmonkey]

Jesus that isn't the point, my point is that she would condone it if he only killed one person? Since if you only molest a child ONCE she thinks that is ok.

That is not true

if it were ongoing and true abuse, that would be one thing

Benoit's murdereed wife filed papers about his ongoing abuse :shrug:

 

[Lilypad]

Who died and made you boss?

Nobody sweet elaine-but come on now

 

[FromTexas]

Okay enough already-this is getting real old

You know why frogs are gay? They make their homes on lilypads.

 

[Lilypad]

You know why frogs are gay? They make their homes on lilypads.

This much is true!

 

[vraiblonde]

No, but it's not some skeezy pedophile sneaking into a little kid's room at night, either.

And should someone who makes a mistake ONE TIME be branded for life and their whole family have to pay the price? If it were ongoing and true abuse, that would be one thing. But that's not what happened.

What part of that is defending a pedophile? Because since you know all about this case, and are so close to the situation, then you certainly know by now that there's no pedophile to defend.

Right?

 

[Spudtrooper]

What part of that is defending a pedophile? Because since you know all about this case, and are so close to the situation, then you certainly know by now that there's no pedophile to defend.

Right?

I highly doubt that. Nice spin though,spindoctor!

 

[Spudtrooper]

I highly doubt that. Nice spin though,spindoctor!

EVEN IF HE DIDN'T MOLEST ANYONE THAT IS NOT THE CASE! You are still quoted as saying,"if it was only once,why should that ruin his life?'

 

[vraiblonde]

I highly doubt that.

You better call the cops, then, and let them know you have new evidence.

 

[vraiblonde]

EVEN IF HE DIDN'T MOLEST ANYONE THAT IS NOT THE CASE! You are still quoted as saying,"if it was only once,why should that ruin his life?'

Actually, Slowie, if you read instead of fantasize, you'd see that I was concerned about his FAMILY paying the price, not him. But don't let facts get in the way of your ####-stirring.

Do carry on.

 

[LordStanley]

 

[jetmonkey]

Quote:
<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td class="alt2" style="border: 1px inset ;"> Originally Posted by Spudtrooper
I highly doubt that. Nice spin though,spindoctor!
</td></tr></tbody></table>

EVEN IF HE DIDN'T MOLEST ANYONE THAT IS NOT THE CASE! You are still quoted as saying,"if it was only once,why should that ruin his life?'

Why are you so angry at yourself?