And you you honestly think it would be any different if Hillary came and spoke to this forum?
She would be questioned on things that would make her uncomfortable, that is for certain. But assaulted and shouted down? No.
And you you honestly think it would be any different if Hillary came and spoke to this forum?
She would be questioned on things that would make her uncomfortable, that is for certain. But assaulted and shouted down? No.
well if you're shut down every single time ....
or again, I ask, is that just an exagguration?
Well if we knew where they were then why not follow them?
If we know they're in syria why not attack?
we went to one country for them. Why go "ehhh they still exist but .... eh .... I guess it's ok"?
because every democrat does these things?
...we went to war against Iraq in 1991 out of honor to a treaty with Kuwait and with the blessings of everyone in the region. As a condition of a CEASE FIRE, not an end to the war but a time out, Iraq agreed to certain, specific conditions.
Iraq went about bending and circumventing and in some cases flat out ignoring these agreements. Even the freaking UN agrees to that.
Iraq had mostly but not completely complied with UN inspectors. Iraq had numerous instances where it seemed readily evident to everyone that the building blocks of restarting weapons programs were being hidden.
Iraq had but to simply comply and the basis for any more pressure on them vaporizes.
We, as a nation, actually have a debate among us over who is worse, a dictator or a duly elected US president. We actually have arguments over whose fault it was; a leadership fully capable of complying with UN resolutions that they had agreed to and chose NOT to or a duly elected sitting US president who decided the time for screwing around had come to an end.
Dean and Kucinich and a good portion of the US left sees Bush as the enemy and can not in thought word or deed bring themselves to call either Saddam or Usama an enemy of the US or anyone else for that matter. Hillary and Obama and Edwards and Pelosi have not broken a sweat defending our own institutions against this sort of intellectual retardation.
That's just the way it is. It makes it damn tough to hold accountable a president suffering from excess exuberance and hubris when the alternative is the mentally ill.
My biggest problem with Hillary is she DOESN'T answer questions from real people.She would be questioned on things that would make her uncomfortable, that is for certain. But assaulted and shouted down? No.
She would be questioned on things that would make her uncomfortable, that is for certain. But assaulted and shouted down? No.
No, not EVERY Democrat. But enough that they have created a stereotype for the whole group. Plus, I don't notice the party leadership denouncing that sort of behavior. In fact, the disrupting punks are only parroting what they've heard their leaders say in the first place.
...guns kill people, don't you?
The weapons themselves are inanimate objects. There is a difference depending on who possesses them. Is Syria the same as Saddam? No. Iran? No. Have we been at war for 12 years with them? No. Are there UN resolutions against them? No. Have they been subject to 12 years of inspections they've been dodging? No.
What is so difficult about this?
No, not EVERY Democrat. But enough that they have created a stereotype for the whole group. Plus, I don't notice the party leadership denouncing that sort of behavior. In fact, the disrupting punks are only parroting what they've heard their leaders say in the first place.
In 1988.
No, not EVERY Democrat. But enough that they have created a stereotype for the whole group. Plus, I don't notice the party leadership denouncing that sort of behavior. In fact, the disrupting punks are only parroting what they've heard their leaders say in the first place.
I don't see any Republican denouncing Anee Coulter. She's just as much if not more disgusting.
BWAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!So what?
And once again, a discussion with Lefties has turned into stupidity about Easter Bunnies and all or nothing.
This is what you all do when you don't have facts on your side. And it's rare that the facts are on your side.
Three of the leading Republican presidential candidates on Saturday denounced one of their party’s best-known conservative commentators for using an antigay epithet when discussing a Democratic presidential contender at a gathering of conservatives here.
I disagree. I think she's right on the money, most of the time, and that is what pisses Leftists off so much.
I disagree. I think she's right on the money, most of the time, and that is what pisses Leftists off so much.
Don't get me wrong, I'm for the war, and yes he did have the weapons, but in the interest of accuracy, you cannot say he has them now because he gassed someone 15 years ago.