Supposedly this morning's talking heads at CNN and MSDNC were saying of Lurch's performance, ooofff... that wasn't good.
John Fetterman Is a Weirdo
- Thread starter GURPS
- Start date
They were praising him last night for admitting he had a stroke. Then blamed Oz for everything that went wrong.
WTF, Pennsylvania??
In a party filled with terrible candidates Fetterman is in a category all his own.
In a party filled with terrible candidates Fetterman is in a category all his own.
While Eating Breakfast Thursday, Fetterman Suddenly Answers 3rd Debate Question From Tuesday
babylonbee.com
While Eating Breakfast Thursday, Fetterman Suddenly Answers 3rd Debate Question From Tuesday
BRADDOCK, PA — According to sources, Senate candidate John Fetterman was eating a quiet breakfast this morning when he suddenly blurted out the rest of the answer to question 3 of the debate from two nights ago.
babylonbee.com
Well, they are democrats...
PJay
Well-Known Member
It's the only way they win and they have been cheating a long time.
Newsflash when half of the population is just plain stupid you don't really need to cheat.
Plank writes:
Except Fetterman’s issues aren’t “a stammer” or “a hearing impairment.” Dasha Burns’ in-person interview with Fetterman — an interview that took place after Plank wrote her piece — and her subsequent assessment of it made it abundantly clear that Fetterman’s issues go far beyond “a stammer” or “a hearing impairment.” And as for Joe Biden being mocked for his stutter, it’s not the stutter itself or the idea of having a stutter that critics are mocking; it’s the fact that Biden’s stutter, which hasn’t plagued him for decades, was being used as an excuse for all of his gaffes and lies.
Except Fetterman’s issues aren’t “a stammer” or “a hearing impairment.” Dasha Burns’ in-person interview with Fetterman — an interview that took place after Plank wrote her piece — and her subsequent assessment of it made it abundantly clear that Fetterman’s issues go far beyond “a stammer” or “a hearing impairment.” And as for Joe Biden being mocked for his stutter, it’s not the stutter itself or the idea of having a stutter that critics are mocking; it’s the fact that Biden’s stutter, which hasn’t plagued him for decades, was being used as an excuse for all of his gaffes and lies.
Does this mean the left will stop trashing the Gov of Texas because he's in a wheelchair .?
What Are the Odds? Burned Fetterman Sign Was on Farm of DNC Speaker
The woman who took the photo, Jane Switzer, is a self-described Fetterman donor who lives next door to the farm where this took place. She shared four photos to her Facebook page: one of the sign mid-burn (which is the one Fetterman shared widely on Saturday), one with firetrucks in the distance, and two of the scene the next day.
But that wasn’t what it read originally. Obviously, Switzer went back to edit the post to add additional photos, but she also added the photo location. The edit history details the updates.
A few things were immediately curious. How does one happen to snap a close-up photo of the sign mid-burn, in which it’s burned almost exactly to the point where the burning stopped (as evidenced in the next day’s photo), at 1:30 a.m., and how was the sign not completely engulfed by the time two firetrucks arrived to a rural area? How is it that only a few blades of grass were singed? How is it that the fire department put the fire out at the same time in the burn that Switzer’s photo was snapped – and if they were busy putting the fire out, how was Switzer ALSO there?
What Are the Odds? Burned Fetterman Sign Was on Farm of DNC Speaker
The woman who took the photo, Jane Switzer, is a self-described Fetterman donor who lives next door to the farm where this took place. She shared four photos to her Facebook page: one of the sign mid-burn (which is the one Fetterman shared widely on Saturday), one with firetrucks in the distance, and two of the scene the next day.
But that wasn’t what it read originally. Obviously, Switzer went back to edit the post to add additional photos, but she also added the photo location. The edit history details the updates.
A few things were immediately curious. How does one happen to snap a close-up photo of the sign mid-burn, in which it’s burned almost exactly to the point where the burning stopped (as evidenced in the next day’s photo), at 1:30 a.m., and how was the sign not completely engulfed by the time two firetrucks arrived to a rural area? How is it that only a few blades of grass were singed? How is it that the fire department put the fire out at the same time in the burn that Switzer’s photo was snapped – and if they were busy putting the fire out, how was Switzer ALSO there?
Staged .
Staged .
These are the "Oh, so HIGHLY Intelligent, Educated, Enlighted, Empathetic Souls" that are always telling everyone on the right how violent, criminal and stupid they are.
