Twist! Like a sullen teenager, the New York Times is not letting go of the “Hamas General Hospital” story. On Monday, following a week of blistering criticism, the chagrined Times was forced to retract their original fake news story blaming Israel for intentionally targeting a Palestinian hospital, in a humiliating, 300-word “Editor’s Note,” in which the paper grudgingly admitted it
may have said certain things in the story that
might have been slightly inaccurate — based on what other people told it! — but did not apologize.
It’s not our fault!
The mistake wasn’t just another random blooper and the Times knew it. At least in part, the Times’ false article led to violent worldwide protests, significant property damage, many injuries, and a handful of deaths. Please don’t forget: for at least two years now the Times has been advocating for “misinformation spreaders” to be deplatformed or even jailed. Now
the Times is the one spreading dangerous misinformation. So what standard should the Times now be held to? Should it be held to
its own standard?
It’s a bit of a sticky wicket. So you can imagine the paper was not exactly enthusiastic about admitting it was wrong. The closest its Editor’s Note got to actually admitting the paper was wrong was this meager, passive-voice piffle:
The report left readers with an incorrect impression about what was known and how credible the account was.
Haha,
the report misinformed readers!
Not the Times. So, nobody misinformed anybody. And, they didn’t even say, “regretfully.” As in,
the report REGRETFULLY left readers with an incorrect impression. What’s to regret?
No harm done! Fog of war and all that rot!
But wait! It’s not over yet. The New York Times’ chagrined reporters were up all night, guzzling gallons of coffee, smoking stinky, unfiltered and slightly radioactive but still-virtuous Ukrainian cigarettes, and happily munching kid-friendly cannabis gummies like they were sunflower seeds. The result: blatantly pilfering The Washington Post’s gag, the New York Times announced this morning that it may have been wrong — but it was
still right!
In a full-featured, live-action video backgrounded, long-form story, the New York Times defensively re-analyzed its earlier re-analysis and discovered that, even though it was wrong, so was Israel, American intelligence, the BBC, and even Hamas, for that matter.
In other words,
everybody got it wrong!
I’m going to jump to the end of this ridiculous story, and spare you the ten painful pages of excuse-making and nitpicking, focused mostly on one widely-circulated cell phone video that appears to show a malfunctioning Hamas rocket falling into the hospital’s parking lot. After all that, the Times still carefully said it’s not saying that anybody lied. It’s not saying the Israelis blew up the parking lot. It’s not even saying it wasn’t Hamas. It’s
just saying, and it sure was using a lot of words to just say it:
The Times’s finding does not answer what actually did cause the Al-Ahli Arab hospital blast, or who is responsible. The contention by Israeli and American intelligence agencies that a failed Palestinian rocket launch is to blame remains plausible. But the Times analysis does cast doubt on one of the most-publicized pieces of evidence that Israeli officials have used to make their case and complicates the straightforward narrative they have put forth.
The poor Times was horribly confused. The paper doesn’t know
what to believe. It needs help. Wait … I think I got it!
Eureka. If it wasn’t Hamas, it was probably the same people who blew up the Nordstream pipeline!
Case closed.
Sullen NYT pivots on hospital apology; Georgia Trump trial plea deals; pro cyclists crashing right and left; Cat 5 hurricane comes out of nowhere; war mini-roundup; D.C. re-funds police; more.
www.coffeeandcovid.com