Liberal Companies Working to Destroy Democracy

glhs837

Power with Control
So much for zero carbon.

Nothing is zero carbon except death. Lower is better, but not at any price. In this case, making humanity interplanetary outweighs the environmental cost of launching these rockets. Getting some of our eggs out of this one fragile basket is worth that. Shows you he's not an environmental zealot, but a pragmatist, I think.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
Nothing is zero carbon except death. Lower is better, but not at any price. In this case, making humanity interplanetary outweighs the environmental cost of launching these rockets. Getting some of our eggs out of this one fragile basket is worth that. Shows you he's not an environmental zealot, but a pragmatist, I think.

Of course I was being sarcastic. This is AOC's 'New Green Deal' goal. It goes to show how unreasonable these environmentalists are. I like what Musk is doing. I would love nothing more than to be driving around in a car I never have to take to a gas station. Although, that doesn't come without the reality of what this will do to an entire industry. And, like I said... try getting the Mideast on board with it.
 

DaSDGuy

Well-Known Member
Haha yea that’s why I said the future, not now. Give it time. We’ve come a really really long way already. There’s electric cars that have the same range as gas, outperform gas cars in their class and recharge in under an hour at charging stations. And at $40k. The technology has caught up and passed the gas cars and is rapidly catching up to bikes. Trucks are the next segment and they will catch up and pass gas trucks within 5 years.
Meanwhile in cali they have their weekly brown outs and rolling shutdowns of the electrical power system to prevent fires. How do you recharge your vehicle when the power is turned off?
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Of course I was being sarcastic. This is AOC's 'New Green Deal' goal. It goes to show how unreasonable these environmentalists are. I like what Musk is doing. I would love nothing more than to be driving around in a car I never have to take to a gas station. Although, that doesn't come without the reality of what this will do to an entire industry. And, like I said... try getting the Mideast on board with it.

The industry has a choice. Like any industry facing disruption, its adapt of die. Ask Kodak about that. We don't really need them onboard, well, we didnt, we were looking just fine without them. Now that Joe is putting climate change at the front of the bus, who the hell knows.

Meanwhile in cali they have their weekly brown outs and rolling shutdowns of the electrical power system to prevent fires. How do you recharge your vehicle when the power is turned off?

Same way you pump gas when the power is out.....you dont. But in reality, CAs grid issues show the stupidity of the GND and other climate uber alles religions. A smarter leaner grid with more local sources and storage would help by allowing them to section off areas where the transmission towers cause risk without having to cut anyone off. A few modern nuke plants wouldnt hurt

Although there was one guy with a couple of powerwalls and solar in NORCAL, he kept his basics running and his car charged during a long outage. In Australia, they are trying a Virtual PowerPlant, where 5,000 houses under development are being fitted with battery storage and solar on the roof. The whole area acts as a buffer, storing enegry off peak and then supporting the grid during peak, requiring less use of wasteful peaker plants.
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
I don’t think anyone is arguing for it being jammed down our throat.

Yes, it will happen very quickly; within 10 years.

Yes, people won’t give up their gas vehicles just like people didn’t give up their pre-airbag vehicles or carburetor vehicles or lap seatbelt vehicles or wooden frame vehicles. They’re still out there (and there’s still companies making carburetor or wooden frame vehicles). That doesn’t mean that fuel injection wasn’t the future or metal frames wasn’t the future.

I understand you have to prematurely replace your battery; that doesn’t mean that all EV batteries fail at 50,000 miles. The EVs of today are not comparable to your experience with EVs; they aren’t even close to the same vehicle. I don’t talk about Gremlin’s or Pinto’s or Model T’s when talking about reliability issues of gas motors because it’s dated examples.
The biggest thing is with gas it takes 5 minutes to fill up for another 500 miles, no planning required unless you live way way out in BFE.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
The biggest thing is with gas it takes 5 minutes to fill up for another 500 miles, no planning required unless you live way way out in BFE.


500 miles? Damn, you got aux tanks strapped up? I know there are diesels that can get you those sorts of miles, but I think over 90% of vehicles dont. But it depends on you and how often you take road trips and how long they are. Now, planning, at least in a Tesla, the car handles the planning. Tell it where you are going, it routes you through Superchargers as needed.
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
500 miles? Damn, you got aux tanks strapped up? I know there are diesels that can get you those sorts of miles, but I think over 90% of vehicles dont. But it depends on you and how often you take road trips and how long they are. Now, planning, at least in a Tesla, the car handles the planning. Tell it where you are going, it routes you through Superchargers as needed.
A hybrid SUV, 40 mpg and close to 600 miles range,

My 2.5L gasoline ford Fusion would get 500 miles on a tank of all interstate.
 

PsyOps

Pixelated
The industry has a choice. Like any industry facing disruption, its adapt of die. Ask Kodak about that. We don't really need them onboard, well, we didnt, we were looking just fine without them. Now that Joe is putting climate change at the front of the bus, who the hell knows.



Same way you pump gas when the power is out.....you dont. But in reality, CAs grid issues show the stupidity of the GND and other climate uber alles religions. A smarter leaner grid with more local sources and storage would help by allowing them to section off areas where the transmission towers cause risk without having to cut anyone off. A few modern nuke plants wouldnt hurt

Although there was one guy with a couple of powerwalls and solar in NORCAL, he kept his basics running and his car charged during a long outage. In Australia, they are trying a Virtual PowerPlant, where 5,000 houses under development are being fitted with battery storage and solar on the roof. The whole area acts as a buffer, storing enegry off peak and then supporting the grid during peak, requiring less use of wasteful peaker plants.

I get your point; but this is hardly a comparison to a camera/film maker. We're talking about what provides energy to the entire world, for nearly everything. The goals of AOC and her environmentalist fascists want to destroy the fossil fuels industry. They have no real plan for how this would work, but if they are in power, they will force it on us, whether we are ready or not. It's a moral imperative for them.

If we let the free market let it happen in its due course, we will be fine. There is a guy who invented solar panels that would replace highway and road pavements. Not only can you drive on it, it interconnects into a single power grid that would provide electricity to street lights and other nearby electrical needs. The powers that be won't see it happen. Too much has been invested in asphalt - another product of fossil fuels.

I really need to hit the point that I'm not against these new alternative energy sources. I'm not resistant to change. I am concerned about political agendas that would be forced upon us. Government will more certain F it up, as they did with Unaffordable Care Act. We need to be careful who we elect to allow we - the people - to control how our markets change.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
I get your point; but this is hardly a comparison to a camera/film maker. We're talking about what provides energy to the entire world, for nearly everything. The goals of AOC and her environmentalist fascists want to destroy the fossil fuels industry. They have no real plan for how this would work, but if they are in power, they will force it on us, whether we are ready or not. It's a moral imperative for them.

If we let the free market let it happen in its due course, we will be fine. There is a guy who invented solar panels that would replace highway and road pavements. Not only can you drive on it, it interconnects into a single power grid that would provide electricity to street lights and other nearby electrical needs. The powers that be won't see it happen. Too much has been invested in asphalt - another product of fossil fuels.

I really need to hit the point that I'm not against these new alternative energy sources. I'm not resistant to change. I am concerned about political agendas that would be forced upon us. Government will more certain F it up, as they did with Unaffordable Care Act. We need to be careful who we elect to allow we - the people - to control how our markets change.


And we have been quite clear we dont like the GND folks and govt pushing these things either. Rmorse and I have both said with almost every post that we think the market should drive the change, not the government. Those solar panel roads were silly to begin with, no way thats functional for longer than a year. Ah, here, it wasnt Big Oil that killed it, it was simple mechanics.


I wouldnt have thought a car the size of the Fusion would have an 18 gallon gas tank. But most vehicles dont do that sort of range, can we agree? Most are in the 300-350 range or less. Here's your 400+ mile range cars.

  • Toyota Prius – 12 gallon tank, 50 mpg = 600 miles
  • Honda Civic Hybrid – 12 gallon tank, 40 mpg = 480 miles
  • Ford Fusion – 17 gallon tank, 36 mpg = 600 miles
  • Volkswagen Golf – 14 gallon tank, 35 mpg = 490 miles
  • Chevy Cruze – 13 gallon tank, 35 mpg = 455 mile
 

PeoplesElbow

Well-Known Member
And we have been quite clear we dont like the GND folks and govt pushing these things either. Rmorse and I have both said with almost every post that we think the market should drive the change, not the government. Those solar panel roads were silly to begin with, no way thats functional for longer than a year. Ah, here, it wasnt Big Oil that killed it, it was simple mechanics.


I wouldnt have thought a car the size of the Fusion would have an 18 gallon gas tank. But most vehicles dont do that sort of range, can we agree? Most are in the 300-350 range or less. Here's your 400+ mile range cars.

  • Toyota Prius – 12 gallon tank, 50 mpg = 600 miles
  • Honda Civic Hybrid – 12 gallon tank, 40 mpg = 480 miles
  • Ford Fusion – 17 gallon tank, 36 mpg = 600 miles
  • Volkswagen Golf – 14 gallon tank, 35 mpg = 490 miles
  • Chevy Cruze – 13 gallon tank, 35 mpg = 455 mile

Fusion had a 17.5 gallon tank, I could average 38 mpg up and down I-95 or I-85.

That isnt all of them that will do 400 miles on a tank, Toyota Venza, RAV4 hybrid (maybe regular), Ford Escape Hybrid (maybe regular), Regular accord probably can too, I remember my dad's 95ish having a really big tank.

I'll only buy a Ford or Toyota, and possibly Honda, so not too sure about anything else.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
I wouldnt have thought a car the size of the Fusion would have an 18 gallon gas tank. But most vehicles dont do that sort of range, can we agree? Most are in the 300-350 range or less. Here's your 400+ mile range cars.

  • Toyota Prius – 12 gallon tank, 50 mpg = 600 miles
  • Honda Civic Hybrid – 12 gallon tank, 40 mpg = 480 miles
  • Ford Fusion – 17 gallon tank, 36 mpg = 600 miles
  • Volkswagen Golf – 14 gallon tank, 35 mpg = 490 miles
  • Chevy Cruze – 13 gallon tank, 35 mpg = 455 mile



My 95 Saturn was doing 35 MPG driving from National Harbor to Hollywood MD


straight hiway millage was much higher
 

glhs837

Power with Control
Fusion had a 17.5 gallon tank, I could average 38 mpg up and down I-95 or I-85.

That isnt all of them that will do 400 miles on a tank, Toyota Venza, RAV4 hybrid (maybe regular), Ford Escape Hybrid (maybe regular), Regular accord probably can too, I remember my dad's 95ish having a really big tank.

I'll only buy a Ford or Toyota, and possibly Honda, so not too sure about anything else.


Nope, that wasnt an inclusive list at all, there are more mostly hybrids, and I'm unsure about battery longevity there, not sure how advanced the battery management systems are on those. Although, again, do people drive 400-500 miles without stopping even if they have the range to do so? I mean Newport Rhode island is 450 miles away, and 7.5 hours by Google. Me, I'm never driving that long without taking a break, and I suspect most people dont. I know some people do, but I think most dont.
 
Top