Maryland lawmakers make gun control a session priority

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
only weapons available at the time the Constitution was written should be covered by it.
That's hilarious....and beyond entirely wrong. The Founders very specific intent was to make certain no future government would have more firepower than the average citizens. You know...to avoid another war against tyranny like the one they'd just fought and won, at great cost. Or if not to avoid...to win again. Come on...you are smarter than that.
 

NextJen

Raisin cane
Del Matt Morgan just posted this on FB
 

Attachments

  • 249859E2-E033-44FF-983B-2BCC712B1E1A.jpeg
    249859E2-E033-44FF-983B-2BCC712B1E1A.jpeg
    337.4 KB · Views: 38

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
Assault-Style Automatic Weapons used to kill many people in times of war should not be owned the average citizen. There is no acceptable reason anyone can give for WHY they might want to kill 20+ people in seconds.
I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you meant semi automatic weapons since as you’ve seen in the previous several responses that fully auto weapons are few and far between in this civilian world. Your argument then falls into the why category. Why shouldn’t someone have the ability to have a weapon that’s easy to shoot, has a decent chance of stopping a threat and has the capability of holding enough ammunition to allow for a lot of adrenaline misses? It’s not a weapon of war though it is the predecessor to several. You know what is though, the venerable Colt 1911A1, it’s been in every military dust up in the last hundred years without much in the way of changes, it’ll put a fist size hole in a body and will hold more bullets than a Maryland safe “assault“ weapon.
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
For your consideration ...



There is no such thing a "race". It is a made up propaganda term. There is the human race though. What there are is ethnicities within the human race.
I remember in school being taught about the three great races. There was the negroid, the caucusoid and the mongoloid.
 

Merlin99

Visualize whirled peas
PREMO Member
only weapons available at the time the Constitution was written should be covered by it.
You have to remember that when the constitution was written all of these people had just won a war against the superpower of its day on just those grounds. The British were disarming the colonials and quartering their soldiers in their homes to keep everyone in line. Do you think they had any intentions of stopping at just that point? They had privately owned cannons ( and falconets and culverins and minions and sakers…) and warships to mount them on.
 

black dog

Free America
I dare you to go to Uvalde and say that to the grieving parents.

Sorry your kid died a horrible death but hey freedom is messy and uncomfortable.

You think every other civilized country in the world isn't free?

Eventually you will have to stop hiding behind "freedom": and admit you don't care unless its your kids.

Thats the problem with Republicans. They dont care about anything until it happens to them. Then they finally get some empathy.

Wait till your kid needs an emergency abortion or gets shot at school.
Take a trip to Any Veterans Administration Cemetery.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Eventually you will have to stop hiding behind "freedom": and admit you don't care unless its your kids.



YOUR Personal Problems ARE NOT MY CONCERN

Your Health
If you eat or not
If you have a place to Live or Not


NON of my Concern, Freedom of Choice ..... YOUR Body YOUR Choice, go support yourself

Only YOU can be responsible for YOUR Well being

What do you do when someone is breaking into YOUR House and the Police are 15 Min Away
 

ArkRescue

Adopt me please !
Should we limit your freedom of speech to post on this forum because the internet and computers weren’t available when the Constitution was written? This is your argument.
I am happy for people to have access to muskets and flintlock pistols (or the updated equivalent) because it just seems crazy that anyone can get a weapon capable of killing masses of people and it should be harder to get those more advanced weapons. People should NOT have that much firepower available which has ruined the lives of SO MANY FAMILIES as a sacrifice so we can be armed.
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
I am happy for people to have access to muskets and flintlock pistols (or the updated equivalent) because it just seems crazy that anyone can get a weapon capable of killing masses of people and it should be harder to get those more advanced weapons. People should NOT have that much firepower available which has ruined the lives of SO MANY FAMILIES as a sacrifice so we can be armed.
Today's firearms are the updated equivalent.
 

LightRoasted

If I may ...
For your consideration ...

I remember in school being taught about the three great races. There was the negroid, the caucusoid and the mongoloid.

I wouldn't call them that. Do we call the difference in horse looking animals, races? Appaloosa vs zebra, different race of horse? Nope. We call them a set of different equine species. I'm not sure why the term 'race' was used/invented to delineate the differences in humans. Doubt anthropologists coined that term.
 

Bare-ya-cuda

Well-Known Member
I am happy for people to have access to muskets and flintlock pistols (or the updated equivalent) because it just seems crazy that anyone can get a weapon capable of killing masses of people and it should be harder to get those more advanced weapons. People should NOT have that much firepower available which has ruined the lives of SO MANY FAMILIES as a sacrifice so we can be armed.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 108,000 people in the U.S. died of drug overdoses between February 2021 and February 2022. Of those, more than 70% involved fentanyl and other synthetic opioids.

With these drugs being illegal and banned and still causing more deaths than guns how is it you think banning guns will help in anyway?

The only people that any type of gun control laws have any impact on are people who obey the law, those shooting each other in Lexington park and other cities aren’t concerned about any laws that state you cannot own x type of firearm.
 

glhs837

Power with Control
I am happy for people to have access to muskets and flintlock pistols (or the updated equivalent) because it just seems crazy that anyone can get a weapon capable of killing masses of people and it should be harder to get those more advanced weapons. People should NOT have that much firepower available which has ruined the lives of SO MANY FAMILIES as a sacrifice so we can be armed.
You do understand that the 2nd Amendments main purpose was to ensure that citizens always has the firepower to resist their freedoms being taken away, right,
 

Gilligan

#*! boat!
PREMO Member
People should NOT have that much firepower available which has ruined the lives of SO MANY FAMILIES as a sacrifice so we can be armed.
None of my firearms have ever run out and ruined anyone's lives. Nor have any of the firearms owned by any of my friends. Where do you come up with this stuff?
 

StmarysCity79

Well-Known Member
You do understand that the 2nd Amendments main purpose was to ensure that citizens always has the firepower to resist their freedoms being taken away, right,


You got a nuke in your backyard?

If the Gov't really cared about you you would be dead tomorrow.

You are irrelevant and will never own the fire power to defend yourself from the government. It's just another excuse to hide behind because you are to selfish too admit you are wrong.
 
Last edited:
Top