BuddyLee
Football addict
Nickel said:In what was is that a "Q"?![]()


Nickel said:In what was is that a "Q"?![]()
Nickel said:In what way is that a "Q"?![]()
Simple question, my ass. There wasn't even a question mark. You're on drugs, aren't you?tomchamp said:It's a simple question?
Nickel said:Simple question, my ass. There wasn't even a question mark. You're on drugs, aren't you?
Maybe you should.tomchamp said:Nope..don't do drugs!
Well, Bru, while I don't recall discussing the where or mood setting of the act I will agree that the result could be the same but the expectations of the types involved in this theoretical situation of having unprotected sex are obviously different. A couple (married, career live-ins, etc.) are in a relationship that should have shared decisions. The others (lusting, sinful fornicatorsBruzilla said:But Ken, in all seriousness, what difference does it make if the couple enjoyed animalistic pleasure in the back seat of a car, or two people doing it slow to Barry White back at his apartment? The result is the same... a child is created. The man's sperm aren't any more "responsible" because of the mood at the time of conception, and the egg doesn't request to see proof of marriage.
Ken King said:Well, Bru, while I don't recall discussing the where or mood setting of the act I will agree that the result could be the same but the expectations of the types involved in this theoretical situation of having unprotected sex are obviously different. A couple (married, career live-ins, etc.) are in a relationship that should have shared decisions. The others (lusting, sinful fornicators) that only are having a fling, do not have these shared expectations towards decision making. Thus the couple type should have an expectation where they would share any abortion decision while the casual partakers have no expectation of sharing any such decision.
so it only makes sense that the decision as to what to do with the shared outcome, a baby, should be a shared one also.
Larry Gude said:...when we're talking about words like "fair" and "equality" that got us where we are today in terms of rights and responsibilities that courts interpret and impose.
Where do you see men making out in the courts when it comes to "fair" and "equality"
The 'choice' movement had at its basis the right to equality meaning the man did not own her, that he could not tell her what to do with her body, that she and she alone could choose to birth or not.
Fair enough. If that, freedom, is the issue, why is the man obligated to support the child, outside of the moral? Why is he obligated to use HIS body for 18 years to earn the succor that sustains the wee one when he had no say in wether or not there would be a birth?
If he sacrificed all his rights at the moment of Shangri-la and she successfully fought to KEEP her rights every step of the way, pre, post and at the moment, do we not now have what we originally sought to eliminate, in-equality? Only now the shoe is on the other foot which is specifically of one sex thus a sexual discrimination as well?
camily said:OMG! I can't believe I just found this thread. I too vote for Ken. Funny stuff! I too find dillweed funny, Elaine. The Vrai joke was hysterical, sorry Vrai. Also Bru, all men think they do 50-60% of the "tasks" which is not true.
if she were gone tommorrow the only difference it would make to my home life would be I would be feeding the cats and dogs.
Terps said:If everyone were just responsible about sex, whether its using condoms, women being on birth contorl then this would not be such an issue and there would be so few cases of birth control actually not working that abortion would not be a huge issue. PEOPLE just be responsible and if something does happen make a mature decision together as a couple. Whether it be life or abortion, both should have a say so.
Please read thisBruzilla said:C'mon Ken. You have gone from unmarried and pregnancy, to not caring and knocks up, and now we're at unloving folk and bumping uglies. If I were watching Law & Order I would be hearing how someone has no case and is choosing to attack the victim. What's behind the increasingly negative terminology you're using? Your choice of words doesn't make your case any more valid.
And am I to understand that you're basing your judgement on Roe V. Wade... a decision that been criticized as being one of the worst ever? Am I also to understand that you actually believe your statement "...resulting in a pregnancy the male does not hold any right to dictate what the woman will do, though we know he might become financially responsible at a later time if carried full term, but his wishes don't really matter yet." I've read a lot of your posts over the years, and you've always been a champion of fairness, especially in legal issues. but how can you say that you feel that a guy should (as we're talking about opinions here) has zero rights IRT a child before it is born, while a woman has every right in the World?
But putting all that aside, I would like to refer you back to your comment "No dillweed, my point was that if a guy knocks up a woman that they aren't caring enough to be married to then they have no say as to how she handles it even if it results in their sorry ass paying for it for the next 18 to 21 years." I can understand that in your other comments you are just stating the plain truth of the law as you see it, but I wonder about your statements concerning marriage. What about marriage gives a man a right to stop his wife from getting an abortion, and if so, what about those carerr-live together couples who have been together for years but not married?
Please read thisBruzilla said:That's a fact! Unfortunately people are generally not responsible, which is why we have rules and laws to deal with people being irresponsible. Unfortunately, those laws aren't equal in regards to the sexes.
Being responsible means allowing nature to occur, not frustrating it's natural effects and altering a normally functioning human body...Terps said:If everyone were just responsible about sex, whether its using condoms, women being on birth contorl then this would not be such an issue and there would be so few cases of birth control actually not working that abortion would not be a huge issue. PEOPLE just be responsible and if something does happen make a mature decision together as a couple. Whether it be life or abortion, both should have a say so.