Definately looked like their old selves. I was listening to the pre-game on Penguins radio and Phil Bourque made a interesting conmment. He was wondering why no one on the national shows were commenting on the number of goals Nabokov has allowed in, but were only focusing on Fluery's issues. Which is understandble considering several were extreamly soft and from the last couple years. Totally ignoring that Nabokov has allowed more goals overall in the series (20 counting last night). Even without last night he had given up more total goals than Fluery in the first 4 games (16 to 14).
Besides some of the national commentators having an axe to grind, it's probably because the Pens are the #1 seed, heavily favored in the series, and many people thought the only thing that could do them in is poor goaltending. That, plus how poorly Fleury played against the Flyers last year (ignoring the fact that the whole team played like idiots that round), led them to focus on him.
Obviously the Pens did the smart thing by acquiring Vokoun to back up MAF. Some of the talking heads thought it was a controversial move (too much money for a backup), some thought it was proof of the organization's lack of faith in MAF. And some, correctly so, saw it as having a backup who could lighten the load during the regular season while still getting wins, and could be called on in the playoffs in case MAF got hurt, or started to slump.
Not many teams have the luxury of having another "starting" goalie come in during a series. The Pens can swap in and out if the other faulters, with a reasonable expectation of getting a win.
With the Isles, it's Nabokov or bust.
hope you are not 
