I'll keep that in mind sweetcheeks.Sugarbritches, you need not call someone a sweetheart in here unless they actually like you - to do so otherwise is disrespectful.......
I'll keep that in mind sweetcheeks.Sugarbritches, you need not call someone a sweetheart in here unless they actually like you - to do so otherwise is disrespectful.......
I'll keep that in mind sweetcheeks.
It's just not that simple. There are different circumstances that make abortion a valid option.
like if you realize the people who got you knocked up is a total idiot and you dont want to contribute to the furthering of his gene pool
like if you realize the person who got you knocked up is a total idiot and you dont want to contribute to the furthering of his gene pool
If the life of the child puts into serious risk the life of the mother, I would agree with you.It's just not that simple. There are different circumstances that make abortion a valid option.
If the life of the child puts into serious risk the life of the mother, I would agree with you.
That accounts for about 6% of abortions.. I'm referring to the 93% that are NOT for good reasons.
You see the mucus and lump of cells as an innocent life, others see it as nothing more than a clot.
Instead of being honest in the discussion, you continue to misrepresent other peoples positions.
<1%. I'm still speaking to the 93%.And in cases of rape and/or incest?
For a person to die, rather than abort a child is a choice as well is it not? Even if we decide not to choose, we still have made a choice. My point is this debate is attempted to be decided by ideologues, who can not label me as to what I am. It isn't that easy. You can call me pro-choice, but I know I am anti-abortion. I know that I value life! How can YOU decide what I am?
I don't see mucus and a "lump of cells" as innocent life.You see the mucus and lump of cells as an innocent life, others see it as nothing more than a clot.
Instead of being honest in the discussion, you continue to misrepresent other peoples positions.
I'm not actually "for" it, but I do see it as an immoral, but legally acceptable, option.
thats becasue he is bitter that the woman he chose to mate with decided she could do what she wanted with her body. considering how "honest and agreeable" he is here it is no surprise she made the choice she did.
I'm more than willing to read the data you compile.I have known several women who have had abortions. clinically as well as friends .. 93% with "not good reasons" Im willing to bet every woman who gets an abortion does not document her reason why...for a poll to record. especially women who are victims of rape and incest..i cant imagine sitting down to fill out paperwork and answering the question, "why do you want to do this" with "oh cuz me and daddy got it on and oopsy...duh" women like that keep secrets. also some i have known in hospitals got abortions because they were addicted to illegal drugs, and didnt want to harm the child, or think they would be a good mother, or even some who were on mental health meds that didnt want to jeopardize the progress they were making by stopping them...there are many reasons..I just have never run into a women that said..oh well i have a party next week..ann dont wanna be pregnant..maybe it happens..but i cant imagine it is the majority you think it is.
you dont understand, the only reason women get abortions is because they dont know how to keep their legs shut.
12 days is Until it can survive outside the womb with or without medical assistance, it's NOT a baby and can be aborted. By your logic, a baby chicken is killed with every egg mcmuffin.I don't see mucus and a "lump of cells" as innocent life.
I see a fetus, 12 days after fertilization where it will no longer split to become twins (or more), as a human life. Scientifically, this is a life form with it's own separate DNA, etc., etc. Given the chance (ie, without artificially creating a circumstance by which it will die), it is likely to grow and separate itself from the womb that it was voluntarily placed in by it's host.
Now, you can see that as nothing more than a clot. You would simply not be following the scientific explaination of a separate life.
You quote an awful lot of statistics with out back up. Lets see the proof.I'm not actually "for" it, but I do see it as an immoral, but legally acceptable, option.
I separate my religious beliefs from my legal ones for rape/non-consentual incest/life of the mother issues.
Again, these equate to 6-7% of all abortions when taken in total. The other 93% are just wrong on all levels.
By your logic, a baby chicken is killed with every egg mcmuffin.
(I was not agreeing with the statement. I was making a sarcastic comment, stated by many on here, about why women get abortions)