You've seen more recent material? Or are you being vexatious?2ndAmendment said:It has been established that these videos are three or more years old. I would say they are no longer credible evidence of her current state. I think your acceptance of the remote diagnosis is vexatious.
I thought the most common remark is that her condition has been largely unchanged for better or worse for fifteen years. That the point of a now wished-for autopsy would be vindication that her original lapse has been the cause of her fifteen year state.
In case you haven't read any of my posts of late, I did not say I "accept the remote diagnosis". I've said it gives me cause for doubt. I originally supported her continuation of life. Then I doubted, so I read up on material countering the material I'd read. Then I suspected, she probably IS PVS. Then I talked with someone. Now, I have doubts.
It's "vexatious" (let's just stop the PC and say 'stupid') to doubt? Didn't Larry already establish that speculation on what goes on inside a brain is still unknown?
Why does Terri HAVE TO die, now? If not for 15 years, why the rush? Is she in pain?