Tortured Iraqis

SmallTown

Football season!
Originally posted by vraiblonde

I resent the Democrats predicting a "Vietnam", then doing their damndest to make it come true - i.e. trying to lose the war through public opinion. Democrats are notoriously weak on national defense and, as far as I'm concerned, every single one of them should be prosecuted for treason.


Now lets hear your partisan view :biggrin:
 

Tonio

Asperger's Poster Child
Originally posted by SmallTown
These people have not been defined as terrorists. Gitmo is a terrorist holding area, and thus is not bound by the geneva convention

Legally, you're right. Morally, what the hell's the difference between a terrorist and an enemy combatant? Both will stop at nothing to kill us.
 

Pete

Repete
Originally posted by Tonio
You don't think they just had enough BS and snapped?
No, I think it was just some goobers who got a huge jolly out of having absolute control over other human beings. If those offenders had the same thing happen to them I am sure that they would be squeeeling like pigs about mistreatment.
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Originally posted by Tonio
I thought I would find someone here who believes that the terrorists in those POW prisons don't deserve any humanity or dignity.
It's not about their humanity and dignity - it's about ours. When you're sent in to interrogate prisoners or even just guard them, it's supposed to be a job, not a photo op.

I can't really blame the women for taking delight in humiliating these scumbags - they're just getting revenge for their Arab sisters. But it's undignified to take pictures of your grinning face next to piles of naked prisoners. These folks are supposed to be professional soldiers and it's decidedly unprofessional to bring your personal emotions into your job.
 

SmallTown

Football season!
Originally posted by vraiblonde
I can't really blame the women for taking delight in humiliating these scumbags - they're just getting revenge for their Arab sisters.

Yea, i'm sure that is it :rolleyes:
 

Ken King

A little rusty but not crusty
PREMO Member
Originally posted by Tonio
Legally, you're right. Morally, what the hell's the difference between a terrorist and an enemy combatant? Both will stop at nothing to kill us.
I thought the detainees at Gitmo were being treated IAW the Geneva Conventions even though the requirement is not so clear because it is unsure as to what exactly their status is?
 

vraiblonde

Board Mommy
PREMO Member
Patron
Originally posted by SmallTown
These people have not been defined as terrorists.
These people are in prison because they got caught shooting or planting bombs. Several of them apparently are former Saddam henchmen. I feel no pity for them whatsoever. You can pretend they're innocent schoolboys if you want, but US soldiers aren't there rounding up shoplifters and sticking them in POW camps. They don't have the resources for that. The only people who end up in these prisons are people who have been caught actively engaging in warfare.

You can also pretend the "Iraqi people" are outraged about these prison "abuses", but it's not true. Every interview I've seen of Iraqi civilians is the same - they're tickled pink to see their former torturers get what they've given.
 

jlabsher

Sorry about that chief.
Just heard from the congressional hearings, they moved prisoners around so the red cross couldn't interview them. Sounds vaguely familiar to some other things being moved around in Iraq to foil inspections.

These yahoo guards have screwed the pooch on this one, I think the general will bite the dust too. Heard that everybody in that battalion will have their medals pulled, they were going to get bronze stars.

One thing is for sure, it will get worse before it gets better.
 

Christy

b*tch rocket
Originally posted by jlabsher
The Pentagon brass hates Rummy, he came in and told them "my way or the highway" 4 years ago. If you believe he didn't know about this, maybe they didn't tell him for a reason. An Army friend who has several high contacts in the Pentagon has hinted at the same thing.

The Pentagon "brass" hates Rummy because he came in and shook up their cush little world of privilege they were working under. A friend of a friend of a friend :duh: told me, that Rummy has zero tolerance for BS and butt kissing. Rummy came along and shoveled out the sh!t speakers who painted a constant picture of roses and sunshine. The "brass" also isn't too pleased that he is trying to cut their "cash cow" defense projects. :duh:
 

Christy

b*tch rocket
Originally posted by jlabsher
Just heard from the congressional hearings, they moved These yahoo guards have screwed the pooch on this one, I think the general will bite the dust too. Heard that everybody in that battalion will have their medals pulled, they were going to get bronze stars.

Why would they ALL get bronze stars? :confused:
 

Toxick

Splat
Originally posted by Tonio
Legally, you're right. Morally, what the hell's the difference between a terrorist and an enemy combatant? Both will stop at nothing to kill us.

An enemy combatant is an armed soldier trying to kill other armed soldiers. Despite the pictures of those grinning douchebags giving the thumbs up to their dog-pile, soldiers ostensibly have a sense of honor.

Terrorists are pig-####ing, baby-killing cowards who attack unarmed innocents.


That's the difference.
 

Tonio

Asperger's Poster Child
Well, that difference doesn't matter to the people getting killed. If someone has a shotgun in my mouth ready to decorate the walls with my brains, the last thing on my mind would be whether the guy is wearing a uniform or not.
 

Toxick

Splat
Originally posted by Tonio
Well, that difference doesn't matter to the people getting killed.


You didn't specify that. You asked for a difference, and I think the difference is the honor factor.

From my vantage point there's a big difference. I don't harbor much ill-will against the people currently fighting for their homes in Iraq. Granted, they are the enemy, and I want to see my side win and if that means they have to be humiliated or killed, then so be it - but at the end of the day, I don't HATE them.


On the other hand, I HATE the terrorists. I hate what they stand for, and I hate everything about them.
 

Pete

Repete
Originally posted by jlabsher
Just heard from the congressional hearings, they moved prisoners around so the red cross couldn't interview them. Sounds vaguely familiar to some other things being moved around in Iraq to foil inspections.
Typical selective hearing? The prisoners that were moved around were undocumented prisoners dropped off for safekeeping by "other government agencies" (OGA's). That is double speak for CIA. The MP's are supposed to document all internees. When OGA's drop off prisoners to house them overnight these goobers were not processing them. They had to move them around to keep from getting busted because they were too lazy to do the paperwork, not necessarily because they were being abused. :duh: Read the report.


Originally posted by jlabsher
One thing is for sure, it will get worse before it gets better.
It sure will as long as the Democrats use it as a stir stick to keep everything political.
 

Tonio

Asperger's Poster Child
Originally posted by Toxick
You didn't specify that. You asked for a difference, and I think the difference is the honor factor.

From my vantage point there's a big difference. I don't harbor much ill-will against the people currently fighting for their homes in Iraq. Granted, they are the enemy, and I want to see my side win and if that means they have to be humiliated or killed, then so be it - but at the end of the day, I don't HATE them.


On the other hand, I HATE the terrorists. I hate what they stand for, and I hate everything about them.

Good response. I tend to view this stuff differently, as in the threat to me personally and my family.
 

itsbob

I bowl overhand
Originally posted by jlabsher
How many heads will roll and stars and stripes will be lost over this one? Interesting thing a Marine friend told me. The Pentagon brass hates Rummy, he came in and told them "my way or the highway" 4 years ago. If you believe he didn't know about this, maybe they didn't tell him for a reason. An Army friend who has several high contacts in the Pentagon has hinted at the same thing.

Of course it is too much to ask him to do the honorable thing and accept blame and responsibility for what happened on his watch, that's not the American way, nobody falls on their sword by choice anymore.

According to the news the first head has rolled.. Arab TV just televised a beheading of an American Prisoner in answer to the way we teased their prisoners.. COULD this be why the president and staff were trying to keep this QUIET!??
 

jlabsher

Sorry about that chief.

Pete

Repete
Originally posted by jlabsher
Not selective hearing, heard the testimony on WTOP. Here is the only link I could find though: http://www.mlive.com/news/grpress/index.ssf?/base/news-1/1083854858232100.xml

" ...moving prisoners to hide them from the red cross."

As far as the bronze star (we know the Army hands out medals like candy, but...) http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20954~2138274,00.html

"many, many of those slated to receive the bronze star won't."

Must be that liberal press making things up again.
Here is the official report. I would rather read that than rely on the clarity of thought by some 25 year old staffer writing up questions for a congressman.



here is the report link
 
Top