Originally posted by BuddyLee
no links. I didn't add the 'www'
Neither did I, but I guess it doesn’t matter.
Originally posted by BuddyLee
no links. I didn't add the 'www'
My argument is equal to if not more legitimate then yours. I haven’t gone off topic; I am just stating how I observe you and your comments on this topic. I have said that the soldiers who did wrong (if in fact it was wrong) will receive their rewards for doing so. I have said that Berg’s attackers are Al Qaeda and we are hunting them down (all over the world). Pretty much on topic isn’t it?Originally posted by SmallTown
There is no towel around my head
My bretheren? Not quite. But in typical fashion, you go completely off topic when you don't have a legit argument.
Cowards? Possibly. Only using actions such as prisoner abuse to a weak excuse for killing? Possibly.
The problem is, Ken, you will NEVER destroy al qaeda. It is more of an idea than a group. As long as people hate the US (will always happen) there will always be people killing us. Yes, I know we all get the warm fuzzy with dubya goes on the air and says we're making great progress in the war on terror and we are safer today than we were at 9/11.
Removing clothing removes layers of comfort and protection that allows one to maintain control of their faculties. By removing them a prisoner can slowly be broken to talk and the clothing can be used as a reward for cooperation or a punishment for failing to. It is that simple. Stacking them up on top of each other probably has similar benefit by using group punishment to encourage cooperation. It might not be a fast process but I bet it worked fairly well. Faking a prisoner to believe that you are going to shock him might garner some information if he believes that it will happen, not that it did. Have you ever talked to a veteran Vietnam POW on what was done to them? Compared to what was done here I don’t think it comes close to that true abuse which didn’t get anywhere near the coverage as what this little incident has. Was it beyond the law, might be, but that is what the military courts will determine.But if you want to play this game, please tell me how undressing prisoners, and doing god knows what to them is in any way helping the war on terror... What? I can't hear you? Did you say it does nothing to help? I agree.
Originally posted by Ken King
It is nice to see that you have already caved to the terrorists and that you are willing to give up the hunt. Nice spirit there “Abdul”. And whether you care to admit it or not we are making progress. It might not be in huge leaps and bounds but in small calculated steps, have you noticed any other attacks here on the home front lately? That in itself probably p!sses you off to no end.
Originally posted by cariblue
After what I've seen, I can't believe anyone in still arguing about this.
Originally posted by tatercake
To argue that those creatures were justified in chopping that kid's head off is about the most unpatriotic display I can imagine ... hell, I hafta say it's almost worse than burning a flag; at least that can be replaced.
I'd like to see a few of you who are arguing that they were justified in their actions explain that to the kid's family's faces.
Originally posted by SmallTown
We sometimes forget these terrorists don't think the way we do. They aren't as rational.
To them, our actions in the prison camp gave them enough reason to do what they did.
Originally posted by Larry Gude
...excuse me for being sceptical of you but...
...I think you are ignoring the obvious on purpose.
"Them" as the anti Bush forces are loath to admit, is the people who bombed the World Trade Towers the first time, an attack that, had it been successful, would have dwarfed the loss of life on 9/11.
"Them" is the people who bombed the Kobar Towers in Saudi killing 19 US military personel.
"Them" is the people who bombed two US Embassies, US soil, in Africa killing over 200 and injuring some 2,000.
"Them" attacked the USS Cole.
"Them" gave an ultimatum to Spain.
"Them" ran roughshod in Afghanistan training to bring terror to the world.
"Them" have been in and out if Iraq for over a decade and if you are looking for the real motivation as to why they cut a helpless human beings head off, a non-combatant, look at the connection to all the other acts of terror over the last ten years or so:
Fear of the modern world as manifested by the United States of America.
Originally posted by Larry Gude
In the mean time I'm looking for the media to get over the 'next big thing' that will sink Goerge Bush ...
Okay, now I KNOW you only do this to get a rise out us.Originally posted by SmallTown
Thats the thing, the only people trying to put a political light on this are the republicans.
Originally posted by vraiblonde
Okay, now I KNOW you only do this to get a rise out us.
Good fake, ST - you had me going there for awhile.
Originally posted by SmallTown
It is true.
Well maybe someone should update their rules to include this and that way confusion would be minimized. When signing on your rules state, "Registration to this forum is free! We do insist that you abide by the rules and policies detailed below. If you agree to the terms, please press the Agree button at the end of the page. Note: By pressing the button you declare that you are over the age of 13. If you are 13 or under, please use this registration form.Originally posted by vraiblonde
Okay, let me completely and totally clear, within the bounds of the English language, which is the only one I know with any fluency:
Please do not post links or pointers of any kind to porn sites. It doesn't matter if what you want people to see isn't the porn. If the site contains porn, please do not link to it or point to it in any way.
I cannot spend the day taking phone calls from outraged readers.
TIA.
Originally posted by Christy
But Hezbollah had come out and condemned the beheading. They're all torked off because the beheading put a spotlight on the huge difference in tactics between us and them. We put men in women's panties, they chop off heads. It kind of puts it in a better perspective to the world, what we're dealing with.
Originally posted by Animal
Well maybe someone should update their rules to include this and that way confusion would be minimized. When signing on your rules state, "Registration to this forum is free! We do insist that you abide by the rules and policies detailed below. If you agree to the terms, please press the Agree button at the end of the page. Note: By pressing the button you declare that you are over the age of 13. If you are 13 or under, please use this registration form.
Although the administrators and moderators of Southern Maryland Community Forums will attempt to keep all objectionable messages off this forum, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the author, and neither the owners of Southern Maryland Community Forums or Jelsoft Enterprises Limited (developers of vBulletin) will be held responsible for the content of any message.
By clicking the Agree button, you warrant that you will not post any messages that are obscene, vulgar, sexually-orientated, hateful, threatening, or otherwise violative of any laws.
The owners of Southern Maryland Community Forums have the right to remove, edit, move or close any thread for any reason."
Thank you for sharing. Please make any suggestions or requests to forums@somd.com.Originally posted by Animal
Well maybe someone should update their rules to include this and that way confusion would be minimized.