We all understand that abortion wasn't banned today, right?
- Thread starter vraiblonde
- Start date
You know, I have to say THIS much - I don't quite get the glee those on the right are getting, with this. It's not going away, and trying to take measures to outlaw it utterly is NOT going to work. The only way I can see us ever getting past this, is to develop a legal framework where abortion is allowed that EVERYONE can agree on. Our problem is that on one side, we have "NEVER" and the other side we have "ALWAYS". And life just doesn't work that way.
When it comes to ending life - life of grown people, not a fetus - we have laws governing when it is excused (or in rare cases - allowed). We don't usually punish death by accident when no one is at fault or negligent. When a doctor loses a patient, we don't call him a murderer. When you are defending your life against someone determined to end YOURS - we allow it. When someone is dying and in extraordinary pain - and it cannot be relieved - ending life is merciful. We ALL know these things, because we're human and can reason. There are times when administering death is the humane thing to do.
The same can be said of abortion. There are CERTAINLY going to times when it is reasonable to allow it.
I think we'd better get on board quickly with it, because science is catching up. I may live to see the day when a child can be brought to term outside a womb - and we're going to have to recognize legal responsibilities more and more. It's going to be LEGALLY a bigger mess down the road.
When it comes to ending life - life of grown people, not a fetus - we have laws governing when it is excused (or in rare cases - allowed). We don't usually punish death by accident when no one is at fault or negligent. When a doctor loses a patient, we don't call him a murderer. When you are defending your life against someone determined to end YOURS - we allow it. When someone is dying and in extraordinary pain - and it cannot be relieved - ending life is merciful. We ALL know these things, because we're human and can reason. There are times when administering death is the humane thing to do.
The same can be said of abortion. There are CERTAINLY going to times when it is reasonable to allow it.
I think we'd better get on board quickly with it, because science is catching up. I may live to see the day when a child can be brought to term outside a womb - and we're going to have to recognize legal responsibilities more and more. It's going to be LEGALLY a bigger mess down the road.
Remember that psycho professor back when who insisted that abortion should be legal up to age 2? I didn't see a lot of Democrat pushback on that person advocating for the murder of toddlers. His university didn't fire or reprimand him. The WashPo printed his proposal as a feature op-ed.
The Democrat Party is a death cult that preys on our most vulnerable - won't even pick on someone their own size. They demonstrate it over and over, right out in public in front of the whole world.
Last edited:
Probably St. Fauci. He's all sciency like that.
Wasn't that Barbara Boxer that said that? I think she was having a debate with Rick Santorum (sometime back in the mid to late 90s).
*shrug* Could be. Evidently it's been said by more people than I thought originally.
I'm mortified that we have elected leaders who think it is perfectly acceptable to terminate a living child who is born and breathing.
For no other reason, than it is not wanted by the mother. And have the gall to call it "abortion" when it's clearly infanticide.
the same people who want to force you to take an experiential injection, for ' everyone's ' good
HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
No one has been forced to take any injection. It's amazing you rubes have to be told this over and over and over again.
No one.
OccamsRazor
Well-Known Member
C'mon! This is akin to the moderator's thoughts on travel! Fact is, there have been people fired from their jobs for not taking it.
At my agency, failure to provide proof of vaccination is grounds for dismissal. Period.
Bare-ya-cuda
Well-Known Member
Do you just sit around and come up with dumb sh!t to post? Yes there was a choice…get the Jab or be let go by your employer. Those of us not in the governments nipple who actually work for a living to support their family there wasn’t a choice, there was only the option to get the forced vaccine. So to sum it up for you to better understand…just because there are options there may not be choices.
As playing semantic games go, they weren't forceably dragged into an office, restrained, and given the shot against their will.
Bare-ya-cuda
Well-Known Member
Himroid was typing the same response, you beat him to it.
HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
Virtually all employment is at-will.
HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
OK, that doesn't make it forced. You chose to accept the vaccine to avoid being fired.
I assume government agency, probably not at-will, but you can still leave.
HemiHauler
Well-Known Member
If you see no other options, that is YOUR fault.
You probably aren't hungry enough.
