SoMDGirl42
Well-Known Member
OK... but what about the other side of the coin?
I guess the working non-custodial parent is just screwed for daycare and or other means of taking care of the children while he/she is working.
I just think it should be fair all around. If it's good enough for the goose....
I would be willing to stop child support if he:
1. had the child 50/50
2. supported the child 50/50
As it is, he doesn't. A few hours a month, in my house. That's it.
When my two older kids were younger, their father moved to FL. He took the kids for 3 weeks in the summer (but he did go 2.5 years without a visit). That did not compare to me having them 24/7 for 49 weeks. I did not reduce the child support. Maybe, maybe, maybe if he had them for 3 months I would have considered it. But not for 3 weeks.
When my son was 15, he wanted to live with his father. I allowed him to go without going through the courts and changing our custody agreement. I went to child support office the day he left and put our child support "on hold" just in case he decided to come back. We agreed to do this to save ourselves from lawyer fees etc. It worked out for us this way. In return, he agreed to not charge me child support because he made 4x the money I did, was remarried with two incomes and his military retirement. Thankfully, they are now 26 and 24. They are both living in Maryland. We survived
![Yahoo :yahoo: :yahoo:](/styles/somd_smilies/yahoo.gif)